QA问题：日本境外是否有最高时速超过 350 公里/小时（217 英里/小时）的列车？
Are there any trains with a top speed higher than 350 km/h (217 mph) outside of Japan?
译文简介
关于火车的速度，需要一个精确的定义。1、测试速度，测试中存在的极限速度往往很高，但它只代表技术极限，没有太大的实用价值。2、设计速度，真正建造的火车和铁路系统可实现的安全速度。
正文翻译
Profile photo for Aya Shawn
Aya Shawn
Living in Singapore, professional investorJan 23
Regarding the speed of the train, a precise definition is needed
关于火车的速度，需要一个精确的定义
1. Test speed
The limit speed that exists in the test is often very high, but it only represents the technical limit and does not have much practical value.
2. Design speed
The safe speeds achievable with truly built trains and rail systems
3. Operation speed
In actual commercial operation, the operating speed after comprehensive consideration of safety, performance and economy
1、测试速度
测试中存在的极限速度往往很高，但它只代表技术极限，没有太大的实用价值。
2、设计速度
真正建造的火车和铁路系统可实现的安全速度。
3、运行速度
实际商业运行中，综合考虑安全性、性能、经济性后的运行速度
The limit speed that exists in the test is often very high, but it only represents the technical limit and does not have much practical value.
2. Design speed
The safe speeds achievable with truly built trains and rail systems
3. Operation speed
In actual commercial operation, the operating speed after comprehensive consideration of safety, performance and economy
1、测试速度
测试中存在的极限速度往往很高，但它只代表技术极限，没有太大的实用价值。
2、设计速度
真正建造的火车和铁路系统可实现的安全速度。
3、运行速度
实际商业运行中，综合考虑安全性、性能、经济性后的运行速度
Among the high-speed rails that have been put into use around the world, the more typical comparisons are as follows:
1. Eurostar E320, operating speed: 300km/h, design speed 320
2. South Korea KTX, operating speed: 300km/h, design speed 330
4. German ICE, operating speed: 320km/h, design speed 330
5. Alamein high-speed railway in Saudi Arabia, operating speed: 300km/h, design speed 360
6. Talgo, Spain, operating speed: 330km/h, design speed 350
7. Italian AGV ITALO, operating speed: 300km/h, design speed 360
8. Japan Shinkansen E5/H5, operating speed: 320km/h, design speed 360
9. China CRH 380A, operating speed: 350km/h, design speed 380
10. China CR400AF/BF, operating speed: 350km/h, design speed 400
11. Maglev train in Shanghai, China, industrial operating speed: 430km/h, design speed 501
在全球已投入使用的高铁中，比较典型的对比如下：
1.欧洲之星E320，运营速度：300km/h，设计速度320
2、韩国KTX，运营速度：300km/h，设计速度330
4、德国ICE，运行速度：320km/h，设计速度330
5、沙特阿拉伯阿拉曼高铁，运营速度：300km/h，设计速度360
6、西班牙塔尔戈，运营速度：330km/h，设计速度350
7、意大利AGV ITALO，运行速度：300km/h，设计速度360
8、日本新干线E5/H5，运营速度：320km/h，设计速度360
9、中国CRH380A，运行速度：350km/h，设计速度380
10、中国CR400AF/BF，运行速度：350km/h，设计速度400
11、中国上海磁悬浮列车，运行速度：430km/h，设计速度501
1. Eurostar E320, operating speed: 300km/h, design speed 320
2. South Korea KTX, operating speed: 300km/h, design speed 330
4. German ICE, operating speed: 320km/h, design speed 330
5. Alamein high-speed railway in Saudi Arabia, operating speed: 300km/h, design speed 360
6. Talgo, Spain, operating speed: 330km/h, design speed 350
7. Italian AGV ITALO, operating speed: 300km/h, design speed 360
8. Japan Shinkansen E5/H5, operating speed: 320km/h, design speed 360
9. China CRH 380A, operating speed: 350km/h, design speed 380
10. China CR400AF/BF, operating speed: 350km/h, design speed 400
11. Maglev train in Shanghai, China, industrial operating speed: 430km/h, design speed 501
在全球已投入使用的高铁中，比较典型的对比如下：
1.欧洲之星E320，运营速度：300km/h，设计速度320
2、韩国KTX，运营速度：300km/h，设计速度330
4、德国ICE，运行速度：320km/h，设计速度330
5、沙特阿拉伯阿拉曼高铁，运营速度：300km/h，设计速度360
6、西班牙塔尔戈，运营速度：330km/h，设计速度350
7、意大利AGV ITALO，运行速度：300km/h，设计速度360
8、日本新干线E5/H5，运营速度：320km/h，设计速度360
9、中国CRH380A，运行速度：350km/h，设计速度380
10、中国CR400AF/BF，运行速度：350km/h，设计速度400
11、中国上海磁悬浮列车，运行速度：430km/h，设计速度501
评论翻译
很赞 ( 19 )
收藏
I see Finland and USA on the list and the fastest in Finland is 120 mph and in USA 150mph. Too slow to be high speed.
我看到芬兰和美国在名单上，芬兰的最快速度是120英里/小时，美国是150英里/小时。太慢而不能达到高速。
Compared to normal buses?
与普通公交车相比？
I live in Germany and it has been 5 years. I have taken ICE 3 (the fastest edition) numerous times and it never exceeded 305 km/h. It rarely reaches that speed actually. Most of the time it's between 299 - 303 km/h on the most popular and faster routes, which includes the Paris - Strasbourg route. However, there could be routes that manages to reach 320 km/h limit.
我住在德国，已经5年了。我已经多次乘坐ICE 3（最快版本），但从未超过305公里/小时。实际上，它很少达到这个速度。大多数时候，在最受欢迎和最快捷的路线上，速度在299-303公里/小时之间，其中包括巴黎-斯特拉斯堡路线。然而，有些路线可能达到320公里/小时的限制。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Well, it is really up to the rail operator if they need to move people at that speed and at what interval.
嗯，这实际上取决于铁路运营商是否需要以这样的速度和间隔运送人员
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The answer was in regards to the post mentioning the operating speed of various high speed trains. We aren't talking about the reasons why they move or not move at such speeds.
答案是关于提到各种高铁运行速度的帖子。我们不是在谈论它们以这样的速度移动或不移动的原因。
Also the question of scheduling
还有日程安排问题
Germany has limits on all HSR to 300 km/h. They are legally not allowed to go faster. And given the relatively short length of individual HSR lines in Germany, the additional 20 km/h don’t really make much of a difference.
德国对所有高铁都有时速300公里的限制。法律上不允许他们跑得更快。考虑到德国个别高铁线路的长度相对较短，额外的20公里/小时并没有多大区别。
It's basically the tracks that doesn't allow the trains to travel faster. In certain sections I have seen the speed touch 303 km/h but only for a short period.
基本上是轨道不允许火车更快地行驶。在某些路段，我看到速度达到303公里/小时，但只是很短的一段时间。
Well indonesian was faster than any other hst in eu
印尼人比欧盟其他任何一个国家都快
I'm very sorry, the picture I found is relatively old and does not include the newly built high-speed rail in Indonesia.
The technical level of Indonesia's high-speed railway is the same as that of China, using CR400AF/BF, operating speed: 350km/h, design speed 400.
Congratulations to you, you are well-deserved No. 1 in Southeast Asia
非常抱歉，我找到的图片比较旧，不包括印尼新建的高铁。
印尼高铁技术水平与中国相同，采用CR400AF/BF，运营速度：350km/h，设计速度400。
恭喜你，当之无愧的东南亚第一
Shsssh…don't remind them. You are hitting a raw nerve! Too sensitive n incomprehensible for them to accept the fact that a South East Asia nation's hsr is better…
嘘…不要提醒他们。你真伤脑筋！他们太敏感了，无法理解，无法接受东南亚国家的高铁更好的事实…
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
Hahaha….
哈哈哈…。
US has ZERO km of dedicated high speed rail… as per Finland.
根据芬兰的数据，美国拥有零公里的专用高速铁路。
Another autobot question to feed c** trumpeters
另一个向中G鼓吹者提供信息的机器人问题
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
It's quora prompt . Technically it's western propaganda
这是quora提示。从技术上讲，这是西方的宣传
The answerers are autobots as well?
回答者也是机器人？
I agree that the question draws answers that makes the US primitive by comparison
我同意这个问题得出的答案使美国相比之下显得很原始
Who would be salivating for such questions?
谁会对这样的问题垂涎三尺？
Certainly not the US. In fact it is feeling embarrassed n defeated with regards to hsr
当然不是美国。事实上，它在高铁方面感到尴尬和失败
Nobody that I can think of. Please enlighten.
我想不出有谁。请开导。
c** trumpeters/US bashers
中G鼓吹者/美国抨击者
Should look it as a matter of fact. I would cheer for better infrastructure including transportation anywhere as something we can emulate.
应该把它看成是事实。我会为更好的基础设施而欢呼，包括任何地方的交通，作为我们可以效仿的东西。
Sure. If only more are like u
当然如果更多像你这样的人就好了
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处
The lack of masstransit investment is a scandalous disgrace.
A 70 mile trip from my house to Manhattan takes 2 hours and 15 minutes.
缺乏公共交通投资是一种可耻的耻辱。
从我家到曼哈顿70英里的路程需要2小时15分钟。
Another butthurt western guy spitting his hatred against the Mighty China?
又是一个对强大的中国怀恨在心的西方人？
Say what you want… fact remains that China is no.1 n far ahead of all in hsr. Go cope harder, dude.
你想说什么就说什么…事实仍然是，中国在高铁排名第一，遥遥领先。加油，伙计。
Japanese maglev trains exceeded 600 km/h on trials and operates abt 500 km/h where you can’t bring any luggage that uses another standard rails trains and will arrive later to your destination address in Japan.
日本磁悬浮列车在试验中超过了600公里/小时，运行速度约为500公里/小时。在这种情况下，你不能携带任何使用其他标准轨道列车的行李，稍后会到达你在日本的目的地。
Test speed is outside the scope of my discussion, I am only talking about the speed of commercial operations
测试速度超出了我的讨论范围，我只是在谈论商业运营的速度
Maglav trains on normal rails? Don't think it's possible
磁悬浮在正常轨道上运行？不认为这是可能的