@/No-Cauliflower6572
As a visitor who had a very positive impression, I don't get the negativity from many other foreigners and even some locals. I mean, obviously there are some serious problems in terms of the development of the country - corruption, pollution and lack of an adequate public transport system in the big cities, to name a few - but compared to other countries with similar levels of development it really isn't bad at all. Quite the opposite. I was even a bit positively surprised at how safe and well organised everything is, given that the country was completely destroyed and had absolutely no development 50 years ago I would say your country has done an excellent job at building something from next to nothing. The economy is growing fast, living standard for most people seems okay-ish, very little extreme poverty of the kind you'd see in Latin America, a lot of new things are being built, crime rate and especially violent crime is low. Even on more sensitive issues like freedom of expression, Vietnam is obviously not good but it's nowhere near as bad as places like Thailand where you get locked up for 40+ years for even so much as mild criticism of the monarchy, or have death squads sent after you if you leave the country. Vietnam doesn't do that shit. It also doesn't have dangerous religious extremists like all of South Asia, or in SE Asia Indonesia, Malaysia or the Philippines do. Being gay is relatively accepted at least in the cities - definitely much more accepted than in China or in the other SE Asian countries except maybe Thailand.
Overall Vietnam at this point probably has the same average standard of living as places like Brazil while having far less extreme poverty and far less crime than Brazil. Brazil wasn't bombed to hell and back just a few decades ago. Vietnam is definitely as a whole better off than most of South America (exceptions would be Chile and Uruguay) and life in the cities is safer than most cities of North America and Europe, even. Again, this is with much worse starting conditions than any of the other countries I've mentioned in this post. Vietnam has done a lot more with much less to work with.
So why are many people so negative, despite Vietnam doing comparatively well?|

作为一个对越南印象非常正面的游客,我无法理解许多其他外国人甚至一些本地人所表现出的消极态度。我的意思是,显然这个国家在发展方面存在一些严重问题,比如腐败、污染以及大城市缺乏完善的公共交通系统等。但是,相较于其他同等发展水平的国家,实际情况并没有那么糟糕,反而是相反的。我认为这个国家在很多方面做得相当不错,尽管存在上述问题,但总体上给我的感觉是积极正面的。
我甚至对该国的安全性和一切事务的良好组织程度感到有些惊喜。考虑到这个国家在50年前完全被摧毁,没有任何发展基础,我认为贵国在白手起家、建设国家方面做得非常出色。经济正在快速增长,大多数人的生活水平看似尚可,几乎没有像拉丁美洲那样极端贫困的现象,许多新的设施正在建设中,犯罪率尤其是暴力犯罪率较低。总体而言,这个国家展现出一种积极的发展态势和进步精神。
即使在像言论自由这样敏感的问题上,越南显然做得并不好,但其状况远没有泰国等地那样糟糕,在泰国,即使是温和批评君主制也可能被监禁40多年,甚至有人在离开该国后遭到追杀。而越南并不会做出这样的事情。此外,越南也没有南亚所有国家以及东南亚的印尼、马来西亚或菲律宾那样的危险宗教极端分子。同性恋至少在城市中相对被接受——肯定比中国以及其他东南亚国家(除泰国以外)更受接纳。
总的来说,当前越南的生活水平可能与巴西相当,但其极端贫困现象远少于巴西,犯罪率也远低于巴西。值得注意的是,几十年前巴西并未遭受毁灭性轰炸。总体而言,越南的状况优于南美洲大部分国家(智利和乌拉圭除外),城市生活甚至比北美和欧洲大多数城市更加安全。这一切都是在起步条件远逊于我在此贴中提到的其他国家的前提下实现的。越南凭借相对较少的资源实现了更大的发展。
那么,为什么许多人对越南持有负面看法,尽管它在比较中表现得相当不错呢?

原创翻译:龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处