西方国家对于他们在摧毁拜占庭帝国的事件中所扮演的角色持有什么看法？

Gerwazy
From my expierience, most people in the west don’t know about the fourth crusade or the Byzantine Empire in particular. What I can tell you about, is how academic circles tend to portray the event, and perhaps their role.
Let us begin; The fourth crusade began when Pope Innocence III called for another crusade, gaining support from the Most Serene Republic of Venice, a merchant state with a large fleet and Knights from Western Francia and the Holy Roman Empire. The goal was to liberate Jerusalem once again from Mohamadan occupation.
Alas, unfortunatly, from the beginning private interest became more important, when the Doge of Venice used the Crusaders to put a rebellion down, that took place in Zara. Thus, the first batlles of the Crusader Army was against fellow catholics, leading it to be excommunicated by the Pope.
The partitioning of the Roman Empire was a consequence of the second agreement the Crusaders went in on. Now more of a mercenary army than a christian crusade. In exchange for bounty payments from the Prince Alexios Angelos, son of deposed Emperor Isaac II, the Crusaders agreed to besiege Constantinople. Isaac and his son were restored as Emperors in 1203.
While the Crusader Army was marching to the Holy Land, the people of New Rome deposed Alexios and murdered him. That meant that the Crusaders would not receive the promised bounty. As a result, they turned back before taking Jerusalem, instead conquering Constantinople and carving up the Roman Empire among themselves into Crusader States.
This did not only give way for Muslim conquest, but soured the relations between the Latin and Greek Church further.
How do the “western” nations view their role in the event today? The Kingdom of France, a few Knights of the Holy Roman Empire and the Republic of Venice?
There definetly are many treasures, monuments, columns and trophies from Constantinople in Venice, but the Republic was destroyed centuries ago and became part of the Kingdom of Italy.
Enrico Dandalo, the doge of Italy at the time is still revered by many though, for despite being blind, being an effective and capable leader.
The Holy Roman Empire is mostly forgotten by common people in Germany and unfortunatly there is little continuity, thus a common German does not care about the German Knights in the IV Crusade.
The French are, in my impression proud for France’s contributions in all Crusades. (Especially Kingdom of Jerusalem) But that is just an impression.

根据我的经验，大多数西方人并不了解第四次十字军东征，尤其是关于拜占庭帝国的部分。我可以告诉你的是，学术界倾向于如何描述这一事件，或许还有他们扮演的角色。
让我们开始吧：第四次十字军东征开始于教皇英诺森三世号召的另一次十字军东征，并获得了 “最尊贵的威尼斯共和国”的支持。威尼斯共和国是一个拥有庞大舰队以及来自西法兰克和神圣罗马帝国骑士的商业国家。第四次十字军的目标是再次将耶路撒冷从穆罕默德的占领中解放出来。
唉，不幸的是，当威尼斯总督利用十字军镇压扎拉发生的叛乱时，个人私利从一开始就变得更加重要。因此，十字军的第一场战斗是针对天主教徒，导致教皇愤怒地将十字军都绝罚出了教会。
罗马帝国的分裂是十字军签订的第二项协议的结果。现在更像是一支雇佣军而不是基督教十字军了。为了换取被废黜皇帝伊萨克二世之子——阿莱克修斯·安杰洛斯亲王的赏金，十字军同意围攻君士坦丁堡。1203 年，艾萨克父子复辟为皇帝。
当十字军向圣地进军时，君士坦丁堡的人民废黜了阿莱克修斯并谋杀了他。这意味着十字军将无法获得承诺的赏金。结果，他们在占领耶路撒冷之前折返，回头攻下了君士坦丁堡，并将罗马帝国瓜分为十字军国家。
这不仅为穆斯林的征服让开了道路，而且进一步恶化了拉丁教会和希腊教会之间的关系。
“西方”国家如何看待他们在今天的事件中扮演的角色？法兰西王国、神圣罗马帝国和威尼斯共和国的几个骑士？
威尼斯确实有许多来自君士坦丁堡的宝藏、纪念碑、圆柱和奖杯，但共和国在几个世纪前就被摧毁了，并成为意大利王国的一部分。
当时的意大利总督恩里科·丹多洛仍然受到许多人的尊敬，尽管他双目失明，但却是一位高效而有能力的领导者。
神圣罗马帝国大多被德国普通民众遗忘，不幸的是神罗与现代德国几乎没有连续性，因此普通德国人并不关心第四次十字军东征中的德国骑士团。
在我的印象中，法国人为法国在所有十字军东征中的贡献感到自豪（尤其是耶路撒冷王国），但这只是我的个人印象。

F Andrew Morfesis
It is a matter of human jealousy…once West became powerful it was a matter of time to see if they could destroy pillage or supplant East?

这是人性嫉妒的问题……一旦西方变得强大，他们能否摧毁掠夺或取代东方就只是时间问题了。

WolframAce
Here's a detailed explanation of the perspectives that Western nations hold regarding their role in the destruction of the Byzantine Empire:
1. Geopolitical and Religious Dynamics: Many Western scholars emphasize the geopolitical and religious context of the time. They argue that the fall of the Byzantine Empire was a result of a complex web of alliances, rivalries, and power struggles involving multiple actors, including Western European powers, Byzantium's neighbors, and internal factions within the Byzantine Empire. The Western involvement, such as the Fourth Crusade, is seen as just one element in a larger series of events that contributed to the empire's decline.
2. Unintended Consequences: Some Western perspectives view the fall of Constantinople in 1204 during the Fourth Crusade as an unintended consequence of the crusaders' actions. The intended target was supposed to be Egypt, a strategic obxtive for controlling the Holy Land, but internal conflicts and shifting alliances led the crusaders to divert their attention to Constantinople. This perspective portrays the fall of Byzantium as a tragic outcome rather than a deliberate Western plan to destroy the empire.
3. Medi Power Struggles: Another viewpoint acknowledges Western involvement in the Byzantine Empire's decline but places it within the context of broader medi power struggles. Western powers often had their own motivations and agendas, which sometimes intersected with Byzantium's fate. The political landscape of the time was characterized by alliances, betrayals, and shifting loyalties, which makes it challenging to attribute the empire's fall solely to the actions of Western nations.
4. Regrettable Event: Some Western historians and scholars acknowledge that the Fourth Crusade's diversion to Constantinople and the subsequent sacking of the city in 1204 had a significant impact on the Byzantine Empire's weakening. They view this event as a regrettable chapter in history and recognize the devastation caused to a rich cultural and historical center. However, they also argue that the responsibility should be shared among various parties and not solely attributed to Western nations.
5. Learning from History: Many in the West emphasize the importance of learning from historical events like the fall of the Byzantine Empire. They see it as a reminder of the complexities of international relations, the dangers of unchecked aggression, and the need for diplomacy and cooperation among nations. By studying the past, these perspectives aim to promote understanding and collaboration in the present and future.
It's worth noting that perspectives on historical events can be nuanced and can evolve over time as new research and interpretations emerge. These are just a few examples of the viewpoints that Western nations hold regarding their role in the destruction of the Byzantine Empire.

以下是西方国家对于他们在摧毁拜占庭帝国中所扮演的角色的看法的详细解释：
1. 地缘政治和宗教动态：许多西方学者强调当时的地缘政治和宗教背景。他们认为，拜占庭帝国的衰落是一个复杂的联盟、竞争和权力斗争网络的结果，涉及多个参与者，包括西欧列强、拜占庭的邻国以及拜占庭帝国的内部派系。第四次十字军东征等西方的参与，被视为导致帝国衰落的一系列更大事件中的一个因素。
2. 意想不到的后果：一些西方观点认为，1204年第四次十字军东征期间君士坦丁堡的陷落是十字军行动的意外后果。预定目标本应是埃及，这是控制圣地的战略目标，但内部冲突和联盟变化导致十字军将注意力转移到君士坦丁堡。这种观点将拜占庭的衰落描述为悲剧性的结果，而不是西方蓄意摧毁帝国的计划。
3. 中世纪权力斗争：另一种观点承认西方参与了拜占庭帝国的衰落，但将其置于更广泛的中世纪权力斗争的背景下。西方列强往往有自己的动机和议程，有时与拜占庭的命运相交叉。 当时的政治格局以联盟、背叛和忠诚的转变为特征，这使得很难将帝国的衰落仅仅归因于西方国家的行为。
4. 令人遗憾的事件：一些西方历史学家和学者承认，第四次十字军东征转移到君士坦丁堡以及随后在1204年对该城的洗劫对拜占庭帝国的衰弱产生了重大影响。他们认为这一事件是历史上令人遗憾的一章，并认识到对丰富的文化和历史中心造成的破坏。但他们也认为，责任应由各方共同承担，而不能仅仅归咎于西方国家。
5. 从历史中学习：西方许多人强调从拜占庭帝国衰落等历史事件中学习的重要性。他们认为这提醒人们注意国际关系的复杂性、不受限制的侵略的危险以及国家间外交与合作的必要性。通过研究过去，这些观点旨在促进现在和未来的理解与合作。
值得注意的是，对历史事件的看法可能是微妙的，并且会随着新的研究和解释的出现而随着时间的推移而演变。这些只是西方国家对其在摧毁拜占庭帝国中所扮演的角色所持观点的几个例子。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处

History Depends on the Historian
Mixed, more specifically religion and economics.

看法是混合的，更具体地说是宗教和经济。
原创翻译：龙腾网 https://www.ltaaa.cn 转载请注明出处

Christian Desaix
Mostly they couldn’t care less about what happened in 1453. And in all honesty, 95% (at least) of Westerners have never thought about Byzantium at all. It’s something that very often gets about five to ten minutes in passing in History 101 lectures.
So “Western nations” have pretty much *no* perspectives on the fall of Byzantium.

大多数情况下，他们根本不在乎1453年发生的事情。老实说，95%（至少）的西方人根本没有想过拜占庭。在历史101课程中，这个内容经常会持续5到10分钟。
因此，“西方国家”对拜占庭的衰落几乎没有任何看法

Patrick S
Western nations hold a variety of perspectives regarding their role in the destruction of the Byzantine Empire. This pivotal event in history, which occurred during the 15th century, has stirred debates and discussions among scholars, historians, and even the general public. While it is essential to emphasize that perspectives can vary depending on the individual or country, I will provide an overview of some commonly held viewpoints.
One perspective sees Western nations as playing an indirect role in the fall of the Byzantine Empire. During this time, the Ottoman Empire, led by Mehmed the Conqueror, besieged Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire. Some argue that Western powers, such as the European kingdoms, had little direct influence over these events. Instead, they focused on their own territorial ambitions and conflicts closer to home. From this perspective, it is believed that the Byzantine Empire’s decline was primarily due to internal weaknesses and external pressures from the expanding Ottoman Empire.
Contrastingly, another viewpoint suggests that Western nations did play a more active role in the demise of the Byzantine Empire. It is argued that the Western powers, particularly Catholic Europe, saw the Eastern Orthodox Byzantines as religious rivals. With religious tensions prent during this era, the Western powers viewed the fall of Constantinople as an opportunity to extend their religious influence and gain control over significant trade routes to the East. This perspective emphasizes the Crusades and previous conflicts between the Catholic Church and the Byzantine Empire as contributing factors to Western involvement.

西方国家对于他们在拜占庭帝国的毁灭中所扮演的角色持有不同的观点。这一发生在15世纪的重大历史事件，引起了学者、历史学家乃至公众的争论和讨论。虽然有必要强调观点可能因个人或国家而异，但我将概述一些普遍持有的观点。
一种观点认为西方国家在拜占庭帝国的衰落中发挥了间接作用。在此期间，征服者穆罕默德领导的奥斯曼帝国围攻拜占庭帝国的首都君士坦丁堡。一些人认为，欧洲王国等西方列强对这些事件几乎没有直接影响。相反，他们专注于自己的领土野心和离家较近的冲突。从这个角度来看，拜占庭帝国的衰落主要是由于内部的弱点和不断扩张的奥斯曼帝国的外部压力造成的。
相比之下，另一种观点认为，西方国家确实在拜占庭帝国的灭亡中发挥了更积极的作用。有人认为，西方列强，尤其是天主教欧洲，将东正教拜占庭人视为宗教竞争对手。由于这一时期宗教紧张局势普遍存在，西方列强将君士坦丁堡的陷落视为扩大其宗教影响力并控制通往东方的重要贸易路线的机会。这种观点强调十字军东征以及此前天主教会与拜占庭帝国之间的冲突是西方介入的促成因素。