003型福建舰vs杰拉德·福特-航母比较.上
Type 003 Fujian vs Gerald Ford - Aircraft Carrier Comparison译文简介
视频从各方面比较了中国003型航母和美国福特级
正文翻译
图
评论翻译
很赞 ( 3 )
收藏
The biggest advantage of 003 is that it has low counterfeiting and low maintenance costs. The nuclear power system of the Ford is suitable for global deployment to maintain the hegemony of the US dollar. However, the cost of nuclear power maintenance is huge. 003 is suitable for China to conduct activities in the Asia-Pacific region. In the future, even if China has a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, conventional power will be the main force. Each country should develop its military according to its own national conditions, and do not follow other countries without thinking, because the challenges faced by the military of each country are different.
003最大的优点是它的建造和维护成本很低,而福特级的核动力系统适合在全球部署以维持美元霸权。然而,核反应堆的维护成本是巨大的。003适用于中国在亚太地区开展活动。未来,即使中国拥有了核动力航空母舰,常规动力也将是主力。每个国家都应该根据自己的国情来发展自己的军队,不要不假思索地跟随其他国家,因为每个国家的军队面临的挑战不同。
Excellent video fairly breaking down differences, benefits, and reasons for design purposes for both ships. One other diff between the two ships is that with the Ford they were able to move the island further back on the deck, thus easing access to elevators, allowing easier/faster maneuvering for planes on the deck, and is another subtle factor that will increase sortie rates. This was a lesson they took from the Nimitz as you can see the Nimitz's island is more similarly placed like the Fujian's. Because all the elevators were in front of the island this was also cited as a reason for them being okay removing the 4th elevator as they could more efficiently use the 3 remaining ones while also have more deck space that was easier to use, and therefore it's lost redundancy was outweighed by others gains.
优秀的视频。相当详细地分析了两艘航母的设计目的的差异、优劣和原因。这两艘航母之间的另一个不同之处是,福特号能够将舰岛移到甲板上更远的地方,从而方便使用升降机,使甲板上的飞机更容易/更快地机动,这也是增加出勤率的另一个微妙的因素。这是他们从尼米兹号上学到的一课,正如你所看到的,尼米兹号的舰岛与福建号的位置更相似。因为所有的升降机都在舰岛的前面,这也被认为是他们可以移除第四部升降机的原因,因为他们可以更有效地使用剩余的3部升降机,同时也有更多更易于使用的甲板空间,因此失去的冗余被其他收益所抵消。
China's biggest weakness is lack of experience. They have been building weapon systems they've never used in real combat. They are basing most of their modern military doctrines off of the performance the US had in the Gulf War. However, much has changed since then. The US has the military experience to develop modern military doctrines from scratch because they understand what it takes to use these weapons in actual warefare and what to expect, the Chinese don't. This will be a major drawback for them in any real conflict with the US. We have seen with Russia's performance that equipment does not mean that the equipment will be used optimally.
中国最大的弱点是缺乏经验。他们一直在制造从未在实战中使用过的武器系统。他们的大多数现代军事理论都基于美国在海湾战争中的表现。然而,自那时以来,情况发生了很大变化。美国拥有从无到有地发展现代军事理论的军事经验,因为他们知道在实际战争中使用这些武器需要什么,以及预期会发生什么,而中国没有。这将是他们在与美国发生任何真正冲突时的一个主要的缺陷。我们从俄罗斯的表现中可以看出,拥有装备并不意味着装备将得到最佳的使用。
Just because 2 things look similar, do not expect the same capabilities. US Navy has 250 years of Naval combat operations. The Chinese Navy ships are based on flawed RUSSIAN ships & failed tactics. Look at Russia’s Capital ship Moscow at the bottom of the Baltic Sea. It was unable to stop (2) old 1980’s Harpoon missiles fired by a bottom tier adversary. I completely respect the PLA Army units, but it’s Navy is still a long way off with surviving a direct war with US Navy.
我们不能仅仅因为两件事情看起来相似,就期望它们具有相同的功能。美国海军有250年的海军作战经验,而中国的海军舰艇是基于有缺陷的俄罗斯舰艇和失败的战术建造的。看看波罗的海底部的俄罗斯海军的莫斯科号,它竟然无法阻止20世纪80年代由差劲的对手发射的鱼叉导弹。我完全尊重中国人民解放军的陆军部队,但中国海军要在与美国海军的直接战争中幸存下来还有很长的路要走。
An often overlooked implications of the 003 Fujian, is that because it's a conventional carrier with EMALS, it means that China has the capabilities to mount High Powered Lasers, Microwave weapons and Electromagnetic Guns onto their conventionally powered destroyers.
The 055B destroyer may very well be using similar power management system, to power the Coilgun China has already developed, A high powered laser and a high powered microwave weapon to defend against drone swarms and missiles, coupled with the ship launched hypersonic ASBM YJ-21,
All these would make the Type 055B destroyer almost invincible, it can also take some responsibilities away from the carrier within the battlegroup.
003福建号的一个经常被忽视的特征是,由于它是一艘配备了电磁弹射的常规航母,这意味着中国有能力在其常规动力驱逐舰上安装高功率的激光、微波武器和电磁炮。
055B驱逐舰很可能正在使用类似的电源管理系统,它可以为中国已经开发的Coilgun(用于防御无人机群和导弹的一种高功率激光和高功率微波武器)提供电源,再加上舰载高超音速反潜弹道导弹YJ-21,所有这些都将使055B型驱逐舰几乎无敌,它也可以从战斗群中的航母身上分担一些职责。
Ford-class aircraft carriers have been known for its problem with electromagnetic catapults system since 2014
自2014年以来,福特级航空母舰一直以其电磁弹射器系统存在问题而闻名。
There is no point comparing the two. The 003 is just another test platform for the chinese. Before the chinese will build their true first supercarrier they must master the complexity of a carrier. And that is the 003, they dont intend to deploy it seriously in battle.
比较两者是没有意义的。因为003型航母只是中国人的另一个测试平台,在中国建造真正的第一艘超级航母之前,他们必须掌握航母的复杂性。这就是003型出现的原因,他们并不打算在战斗中真正部署它。
The thing is that even if the Fujian class uses better tech in its radars, it sould not be outright better than Ford class flagship... Experience matters alot in these fields and Americans have refined their tech for decades now and China is a much newer player in tech space. The same rational can be applied to almost every other factor of their day to day operations. China still needs many more years running at "China speed" to catch up but it will eventually
问题在于即使福建号在其雷达中使用了更好的技术,它也不会比福特级更好……因为在这些领域的经验非常重要,美国人几十年来一直在改进他们的技术,而中国在技术领域是一个新得多的玩家。同样的道理可以应用于他们日常运营的几乎所有其他因素。中国仍然需要更多的时间以“中国速度”来追赶,但他们最终能赶上...