中国SH-15 –东亚最现代化的155毫米自行榴弹炮
China SH-15 – The Most Modern 155mm Self-Propelled Howitzer in East Asia
译文简介
巴基斯坦的炮兵将配备数百门中国制造的155毫米SH-15自行榴弹炮
正文翻译
December 5, 2020
2020年12月5日
Pakistan’s artillery will be supplemented with hundreds of Chinese-made 155mm SH-15 self-propelled howitzers
巴基斯坦的炮兵将配备数百门中国制造的155毫米SH-15自行榴弹炮
巴基斯坦的炮兵将配备数百门中国制造的155毫米SH-15自行榴弹炮
Introduce
介绍
介绍
Pakistan’s artillery will be supplemented with hundreds of Chinese-made 155mm SH-15 self-propelled howitzers. That’s what the website News Nation reported on December 24, 2019. Accordingly, 236 howitzers will be purchased by Islamabad under a contract with China’s NORINCO. According to some sources, the cost of each SH-15 is about $ 2.1 million.
巴基斯坦的炮兵将配备数百门中国制造的155毫米SH-15自走榴弹炮。这就是网站《新闻国家》在2019年12月24日报道的内容。据此，伊斯兰堡将根据与中国北方工业公司的合同购买236门榴弹炮。根据一些消息来源，每辆SH-15的造价约为210万美元。
巴基斯坦的炮兵将配备数百门中国制造的155毫米SH-15自走榴弹炮。这就是网站《新闻国家》在2019年12月24日报道的内容。据此，伊斯兰堡将根据与中国北方工业公司的合同购买236门榴弹炮。根据一些消息来源，每辆SH-15的造价约为210万美元。
Design
设计
设计
Compared to Sh-1 predecessor, SH-15 has several improvements. The better armored cabin accommodates a complete crew of 4 or 5 soldiers. The armor provides protection against small arms fire and artillery shell splinters.
与Sh-1的前身相比，SH-15有一些改进。更好装甲的座舱可容纳4名或5名士兵的完整车组。装甲可以防御小型武器射击和炮弹破片。
与Sh-1的前身相比，SH-15有一些改进。更好装甲的座舱可容纳4名或5名士兵的完整车组。装甲可以防御小型武器射击和炮弹破片。
As mentioned above, the SH-15 retains the 155mm howitzer of the SH-1 and is provided with a semi-automatic loading system, allows to increase the rate of fire twice as fast as the conventional way. The gun barrel is fitted with a double baffle muzzle brake. When moving, the ordnance is held in position by a clamp located to the immediate rear of the cab, which is operated by remote control. When the SH15 is deployed in firing position, two large spades are lowered at the rear to provide a more stable firing platform, allowing it to maintain accuracy when firing at high speed.
如上所述，SH-15保留了SH-1的155毫米榴弹炮，并配备有半自动装载系统，可以使发射速度两倍于传统方式。炮管装有双挡板炮口制动器。移动时，弹药通过位于驾驶室正后方的装具保持在适当位置，该装具由遥控器操作。当SH15部署在射击位置时，两个大铲子在后部降低，以提供更稳定的射击平台，使其在高速射击时保持精度。
如上所述，SH-15保留了SH-1的155毫米榴弹炮，并配备有半自动装载系统，可以使发射速度两倍于传统方式。炮管装有双挡板炮口制动器。移动时，弹药通过位于驾驶室正后方的装具保持在适当位置，该装具由遥控器操作。当SH15部署在射击位置时，两个大铲子在后部降低，以提供更稳定的射击平台，使其在高速射击时保持精度。
Firepower
火力
火力
The SH15 has a maximum firing range of 20 km with standard ammunition and 53 km with a rocket-assisted projectile. The maximum rate of fire is 4 to 6 rounds per minute. It is compatible with all standard 155 mm NATO ammunition, as well as indigenous ammunition developed by NORINCO.
SH15使用标准弹药时的最大射程为20公里，使用火箭辅助弹丸时的最大射程为53公里。最大射速为每分钟4至6发炮弹。它与所有标准155毫米北约标准弹药以及NORINCO开发的自产弹药兼容。
SH15使用标准弹药时的最大射程为20公里，使用火箭辅助弹丸时的最大射程为53公里。最大射速为每分钟4至6发炮弹。它与所有标准155毫米北约标准弹药以及NORINCO开发的自产弹药兼容。
A special feature of this howitzer is that the chassis system is capable of raising or lowering depending on the terrain conditions and the payload. The built-in ammunition boxes are located on the each side of the vehicle quite clearly, and are easily affected when the vehicle is moving on rough roads. A total of 48 rounds of ammunition reserve. Elevation and traverse is hydraulically operated.
这种榴弹炮的一个特殊功能是，底盘系统能够根据具体地形和有效载荷来升高或降低。内置弹药箱非常整齐地位于车辆的两侧，在车辆在崎岖的道路上行驶时很容易受到影响。共有48发弹药储备。提升和横移是由液压操作的。
这种榴弹炮的一个特殊功能是，底盘系统能够根据具体地形和有效载荷来升高或降低。内置弹药箱非常整齐地位于车辆的两侧，在车辆在崎岖的道路上行驶时很容易受到影响。共有48发弹药储备。提升和横移是由液压操作的。
Overall, this self-propelled howitzer system is highly mobile and powerful. It can be deployed at long distances or can be transported by medium transport aircraft. It is light enough to be carried by Y-9 or similar military transport aircraft. SH-15 will be a flexible choice for quick reaction units, enhanced combat power, survivability, automation, and digitization for artillery forces.
综上所述，这种自行榴弹炮系统具有高度的机动性和强大的火力。它可以长途机动部署，也可以由中型运输机运输。它足够轻以至可以由Y-9或类似的军用运输机运输。 SH-15将是快速反应部队、增强的战斗力、生存能力、自动化和火炮部队数字化的灵活选择。
综上所述，这种自行榴弹炮系统具有高度的机动性和强大的火力。它可以长途机动部署，也可以由中型运输机运输。它足够轻以至可以由Y-9或类似的军用运输机运输。 SH-15将是快速反应部队、增强的战斗力、生存能力、自动化和火炮部队数字化的灵活选择。
评论翻译
Cesar Ojeda
big trucks with big guns, that can be shipped by air, what more could you ask for.
带有大炮的大型卡车可以空运，您还能要求什么呢
big trucks with big guns, that can be shipped by air, what more could you ask for.
带有大炮的大型卡车可以空运，您还能要求什么呢
N.W. Jonkhart
The engines will be a nightmare for the maintenance crews. Replace them with a western or Russian engine as soon as possible. The gun is hard to mess up as it's seventies technology and the computers will be decent because they have stolen enough technology to produce a reliable copy. But if they copied it too precise they will also have the kill code inside it
发动机将是维修人员的噩梦。尽快用西方或俄罗斯的发动机更换它们。这种炮很难弄乱，因为它是七十年代的技术，而计算机也很不错，因为它们已经窃取了足够的技术来产生可靠的克隆版本。但是如果他们复制得太精确，它里面也会有kill代码
The engines will be a nightmare for the maintenance crews. Replace them with a western or Russian engine as soon as possible. The gun is hard to mess up as it's seventies technology and the computers will be decent because they have stolen enough technology to produce a reliable copy. But if they copied it too precise they will also have the kill code inside it
发动机将是维修人员的噩梦。尽快用西方或俄罗斯的发动机更换它们。这种炮很难弄乱，因为它是七十年代的技术，而计算机也很不错，因为它们已经窃取了足够的技术来产生可靠的克隆版本。但是如果他们复制得太精确，它里面也会有kill代码
lord templar
China has become a major weapons manufacturer in such a short time. Pretty impressive. And yes they probably copy and steal designs from others, but everyone else does that too in the military hardware business!PS i am no fan of the chinese regime or their aggressive policies in Hong Kong or South China seas, but i can be obxtive about how well they have progressed as a weapons manufacturer.
在如此短的时间内，中国已经成为主要的武器制造国。令人印象深刻。是的，他们可能会复制和窃取他人的设计，但是其他人在军事硬件行业也是如此！ PS：我不喜欢中国的政策，但我可以客观地看待它们作为武器制造商的进步。
China has become a major weapons manufacturer in such a short time. Pretty impressive. And yes they probably copy and steal designs from others, but everyone else does that too in the military hardware business!PS i am no fan of the chinese regime or their aggressive policies in Hong Kong or South China seas, but i can be obxtive about how well they have progressed as a weapons manufacturer.
在如此短的时间内，中国已经成为主要的武器制造国。令人印象深刻。是的，他们可能会复制和窃取他人的设计，但是其他人在军事硬件行业也是如此！ PS：我不喜欢中国的政策，但我可以客观地看待它们作为武器制造商的进步。
JediMind Trix
The thing is none of this equipment has been tested in battle. Russian and Western equipment has. There is a lot of speculation that Chinese equipment wouldn't hold up over the long haul In a war due to cheap metals and sub par construction methods used. If you look at Chinese compared to US made ships for example. The welding is not nearly as well done and the overall displacement and weight of chinese ships is much lighter than their counterparts. Their systems are much simpler as well and not in a good way. I forgot which African country bought some Chinese attack helicopters but they broke down on them really quick. You can google that. I just did actually and found quite a few instances of chinese helicopter crashes due to engine failures. So based on that I'm not placing bets on their other equipment holding up either. They look the part but when you peel back the wrapper not so much. That's the speculation at least....until there is a time their equipment is actually put to the real test of battle we won't know for sure
事实是，这些设备都没有经过实战考验。俄罗斯和西方装备都经历过。有很多人猜测，由于廉价的金属和使用的低于标准的建造方式，在战争中，中国的设备不能长期维持下去。如果您看一下中国制造的船与美国制造的船相比，焊接效果不佳，中国船只的总排水量和重量都比同类船轻得多。他们的系统也很简单，而且不够好。我忘记了哪个非洲国家购买了一些中国攻击直升机，但它们很快就被击落了。你可以用谷歌搜索一下。我实际上确实做了，发现很多中国直升机因发动机故障而坠毁的事例。因此，基于此，我不会押注他们生产的其他任何设备。它们看起来很好，但是当您将包装纸剥开时，它们就不会那么好。至少这是猜测....直到他们的时间 装备实际上已经过实战测试，我们不确定
The thing is none of this equipment has been tested in battle. Russian and Western equipment has. There is a lot of speculation that Chinese equipment wouldn't hold up over the long haul In a war due to cheap metals and sub par construction methods used. If you look at Chinese compared to US made ships for example. The welding is not nearly as well done and the overall displacement and weight of chinese ships is much lighter than their counterparts. Their systems are much simpler as well and not in a good way. I forgot which African country bought some Chinese attack helicopters but they broke down on them really quick. You can google that. I just did actually and found quite a few instances of chinese helicopter crashes due to engine failures. So based on that I'm not placing bets on their other equipment holding up either. They look the part but when you peel back the wrapper not so much. That's the speculation at least....until there is a time their equipment is actually put to the real test of battle we won't know for sure
事实是，这些设备都没有经过实战考验。俄罗斯和西方装备都经历过。有很多人猜测，由于廉价的金属和使用的低于标准的建造方式，在战争中，中国的设备不能长期维持下去。如果您看一下中国制造的船与美国制造的船相比，焊接效果不佳，中国船只的总排水量和重量都比同类船轻得多。他们的系统也很简单，而且不够好。我忘记了哪个非洲国家购买了一些中国攻击直升机，但它们很快就被击落了。你可以用谷歌搜索一下。我实际上确实做了，发现很多中国直升机因发动机故障而坠毁的事例。因此，基于此，我不会押注他们生产的其他任何设备。它们看起来很好，但是当您将包装纸剥开时，它们就不会那么好。至少这是猜测....直到他们的时间 装备实际上已经过实战测试，我们不确定
lord templar
@JediMind Trix you make good points. But it is speculation which may be true or not, we just don't know.
But in 2000 China was nowehere on the world stage as a weapons manufacturer. And today it is a major player.
No doubt they will continue to improve their gear in years to come. Furthrmore a lot of western tech also has not been proven, F35 etc... Patriot didn't shine in Israel vs Scuds or in KSA vs Iranian attacks on platforms. No one is above reproach and everyone continues to debug and improve their systems. China is defenitely invested in this, maybe still behind the curve vs the US but it is catching up. They just landed a drone on the moon, so they are not incompetent technically and should not be dismissed and underestimated easily.
My 2 cents
您说的很对。但我们只是不知道，这是猜测，可能是真的，也可能不是。 但是在2000年，中国以武器制造商的身份走上了世界舞台。今天，它已成为主要参与者。 毫无疑问，他们将在未来几年内继续改进自己的装备。此外，许多西方技术还没有得到验证，例如F35等。爱国者在以色列，飞毛腿或KSA与伊朗对平台的攻击中都没有表现出来。无可非议，每个人都在继续调试和改进他们的系统。中国在这方面进行了大量的投资，与美国相比也许仍落后，但正在追赶。他们将一架无人驾驶飞船降落在月球上，因此从技术上来讲他们并不是低级的，不应该被轻易忽视和低估。 我的2美分
@JediMind Trix you make good points. But it is speculation which may be true or not, we just don't know.
But in 2000 China was nowehere on the world stage as a weapons manufacturer. And today it is a major player.
No doubt they will continue to improve their gear in years to come. Furthrmore a lot of western tech also has not been proven, F35 etc... Patriot didn't shine in Israel vs Scuds or in KSA vs Iranian attacks on platforms. No one is above reproach and everyone continues to debug and improve their systems. China is defenitely invested in this, maybe still behind the curve vs the US but it is catching up. They just landed a drone on the moon, so they are not incompetent technically and should not be dismissed and underestimated easily.
My 2 cents
您说的很对。但我们只是不知道，这是猜测，可能是真的，也可能不是。 但是在2000年，中国以武器制造商的身份走上了世界舞台。今天，它已成为主要参与者。 毫无疑问，他们将在未来几年内继续改进自己的装备。此外，许多西方技术还没有得到验证，例如F35等。爱国者在以色列，飞毛腿或KSA与伊朗对平台的攻击中都没有表现出来。无可非议，每个人都在继续调试和改进他们的系统。中国在这方面进行了大量的投资，与美国相比也许仍落后，但正在追赶。他们将一架无人驾驶飞船降落在月球上，因此从技术上来讲他们并不是低级的，不应该被轻易忽视和低估。 我的2美分
JediMind Trix
@lord templar absolutely! I believe it was Nixon who said the Chinese were the most capable people on the planet. I always say never underestimate anyone. China will continue to improve as time goes on for sure. However as it stands today China is only exporting to 3rd world and some larger but poorer countries. Pakistan and occasionally Turkey are their most wealthy customers. I believe there is a reason Russian weapons are king in the lower budget arms market over China. Even though the F35 is not proven in combat the systems it operates on like the avionics and the data sharing has been in use on other systems for years. I'm not saying China isn't capable at all. I'm just saying unlike Russia or the Western nation's China has yet to cut it's teeth with any combat using any of it's equipment at all. The last time the PLA saw combat was in vietnam after we pulled out back in the 70s. There is barely anyone left in the PLA who has had any combat experience. That type of experience is vital in development of weapons due to the data you collect. Something that seems like it works on the testing ground may not work so well after 7 months of hard and brutal use. That's the main criticism of Chinese equipment I believe. Who knows though...I sure wouldn't want to test It and find out that's for sure. I am of the mind that If we here in the. USA and the Western world put our heads together with Russia, China and India the things we could accomplish together would be astounding. We would already be colonizing other solar systems if we could stop worrying about fighting each other. Although there are murmurs that we already have been doing that lol. Depends on how far down the black Budget technology rabbit hole you are willing to go. I have an amazing documentary on anti gravity and reverse engineered alien technology that really is astounding and we'll out together. Goes into the details of a craft America put together in the 50s called the "Fluxliner" and all I can say is wow. It's called "Zero Point the story of mark McCandlish and the Fluxliner" here on youtube. Ill come back and edit my comment with the lix here in a second. If you watch it let me know what you think!
我相信是尼克松说的中国人是地球上最有能力的人。我总是说永远不要低估任何人。随着时间的推移，中国将继续改进。然而，按照今天的现状，中国仅向第三世界和一些较大但较贫穷的国家出口。巴基斯坦和土耳其有时是他们最富有的客户。我认为，在中国较低端的武器市场上，俄罗斯武器是王者是有原因的。尽管F35尚未在实战中上得到验证，但它的运行就像航空电子设备一样，数据共享已在其他系统上使用了多年。我并不是说中国根本没有这能力。
我只是说，与俄罗斯或西方国家不同，中国的所有装备还没有在实战中使用过。在上世纪70年代撤军之后，上一次解放军经历的战斗是在越南。解放军中几乎没有人有过实战经验。那种实战经验中收集的数据对武器开发至关重要。 似乎在测试现场上经过7个月的严格和虐待测试可以工作的装备在实战中可能无法很好地工作。 这是我对中国装备的主要评价。 谁知道呢...我肯定不想测试它并确定是肯定的。 我的想法是，如果我们在一起， 美国和西方世界与俄罗斯、中国和印度齐心协力，我们可以共同完成的事情将是惊人的。 如果我们能够停止勾心斗角的话，我们早已经在殖民其他太阳系。
尽管有些异议，我们可能已经在开始实施了。 取决于您愿意走多远的黑色科技预算无底洞。 我有一部关于反重力和反向工程外星技术的令人惊叹的纪录片，确实令人吃惊。（纪录片） 详细介绍了美国在50年代组装的名为“ Fluxliner”的工艺，我只能说 哇。 在YouTube上被称为“零点标记马克·麦坎德利和助焊剂的故事”。 请稍后再编辑我的评论和链接。 如果您看了，让我知道您的想法！
@lord templar absolutely! I believe it was Nixon who said the Chinese were the most capable people on the planet. I always say never underestimate anyone. China will continue to improve as time goes on for sure. However as it stands today China is only exporting to 3rd world and some larger but poorer countries. Pakistan and occasionally Turkey are their most wealthy customers. I believe there is a reason Russian weapons are king in the lower budget arms market over China. Even though the F35 is not proven in combat the systems it operates on like the avionics and the data sharing has been in use on other systems for years. I'm not saying China isn't capable at all. I'm just saying unlike Russia or the Western nation's China has yet to cut it's teeth with any combat using any of it's equipment at all. The last time the PLA saw combat was in vietnam after we pulled out back in the 70s. There is barely anyone left in the PLA who has had any combat experience. That type of experience is vital in development of weapons due to the data you collect. Something that seems like it works on the testing ground may not work so well after 7 months of hard and brutal use. That's the main criticism of Chinese equipment I believe. Who knows though...I sure wouldn't want to test It and find out that's for sure. I am of the mind that If we here in the. USA and the Western world put our heads together with Russia, China and India the things we could accomplish together would be astounding. We would already be colonizing other solar systems if we could stop worrying about fighting each other. Although there are murmurs that we already have been doing that lol. Depends on how far down the black Budget technology rabbit hole you are willing to go. I have an amazing documentary on anti gravity and reverse engineered alien technology that really is astounding and we'll out together. Goes into the details of a craft America put together in the 50s called the "Fluxliner" and all I can say is wow. It's called "Zero Point the story of mark McCandlish and the Fluxliner" here on youtube. Ill come back and edit my comment with the lix here in a second. If you watch it let me know what you think!
我相信是尼克松说的中国人是地球上最有能力的人。我总是说永远不要低估任何人。随着时间的推移，中国将继续改进。然而，按照今天的现状，中国仅向第三世界和一些较大但较贫穷的国家出口。巴基斯坦和土耳其有时是他们最富有的客户。我认为，在中国较低端的武器市场上，俄罗斯武器是王者是有原因的。尽管F35尚未在实战中上得到验证，但它的运行就像航空电子设备一样，数据共享已在其他系统上使用了多年。我并不是说中国根本没有这能力。
我只是说，与俄罗斯或西方国家不同，中国的所有装备还没有在实战中使用过。在上世纪70年代撤军之后，上一次解放军经历的战斗是在越南。解放军中几乎没有人有过实战经验。那种实战经验中收集的数据对武器开发至关重要。 似乎在测试现场上经过7个月的严格和虐待测试可以工作的装备在实战中可能无法很好地工作。 这是我对中国装备的主要评价。 谁知道呢...我肯定不想测试它并确定是肯定的。 我的想法是，如果我们在一起， 美国和西方世界与俄罗斯、中国和印度齐心协力，我们可以共同完成的事情将是惊人的。 如果我们能够停止勾心斗角的话，我们早已经在殖民其他太阳系。
尽管有些异议，我们可能已经在开始实施了。 取决于您愿意走多远的黑色科技预算无底洞。 我有一部关于反重力和反向工程外星技术的令人惊叹的纪录片，确实令人吃惊。（纪录片） 详细介绍了美国在50年代组装的名为“ Fluxliner”的工艺，我只能说 哇。 在YouTube上被称为“零点标记马克·麦坎德利和助焊剂的故事”。 请稍后再编辑我的评论和链接。 如果您看了，让我知道您的想法！
相关链接
-
- 速达SA 01：中国电动车以超低价格来到德国 2020/12/09 32504 56 1
-
- 人造太阳—中国新一代核聚变反应实验堆启动 2020/12/09 24545 51 1
-
- 中国嫦娥5号飞行器在月球轨道完成首次对接，网友惊叹：拿破仑是对 2020/12/08 39948 70 1
-
- 16倍音速，全球2小时抵达：中国人研制了一款怪兽级发动机—站立式斜 2020/12/08 43016 34 1
-
- 走在中国小城的街道上（下） 2020/12/08 36490 62 1
-
- 走在中国小城的街道上（上） 2020/12/08 33842 27 1
-
- [中国市场]面对新冠中高涨的13亿欲望，日本企业该何去何从？（无评 2020/12/08 36852 67 1
-
- 为什么墨西哥比中国和泰国发达？ 2020/12/08 40148 130 1
闽公网安备 35020302001346号
该译文暂不支持评论哦