3M公司把亚马逊店铺告了,后者涉嫌以23美元/片的价格出售假冒N95口罩
3M sues Amazon storefront that allegedly sold fake N95 masks for $23 apiece
译文简介
据《华尔街日报》首次报道,3M公司已对亚马逊上的第三方卖家KMJ Trading Inc提起诉讼,据称,该公司销售了价值35万多美元的N95口罩,这些口罩的标价高达23美元一片,加价巨大,这些口罩的标价为1.27美元/片
正文翻译
3M sues Amazon storefront that allegedly sold fake N95 masks for $23 apiece
3M公司把亚马逊店铺告了,后者涉嫌以23美元/片的价格出售假冒N95口罩
3M公司把亚马逊店铺告了,后者涉嫌以23美元/片的价格出售假冒N95口罩

The 3M corporation has filed suit against a third-party Amazon seller called KMJ Trading Inc, which allegedly sold more than $350,000 worth of N95 respirator masks, as first reported by The Wall Street Journal. The products were listed for as much as $23 per mask — a huge markup from the list price of $1.27.
Amazon has struggled with counterfeit mask sales since the beginning of the novel coronavirus outbreak, when N95 masks became an urgent necessity for essential workers. Amazon warned Marketplace sellers against price gouging as early as February, ultimately restricting sales of both face masks and hand sanitizer on March 11th. KMJ’s alleged price-gouging took place before those restrictions went into effect, beginning on February 24th.
KMJ itself used multiple accounts to make those sales, offering 45 different products across three different storefronts.
据《华尔街日报》首次报道,3M公司已对亚马逊上的第三方卖家KMJ Trading Inc提起诉讼,据称,该公司销售了价值35万多美元的N95口罩,这些口罩的标价高达23美元一片,加价巨大,这些口罩的标价为1.27美元/片
自从新冠病毒爆发以来,亚马逊一直在努力与假冒口罩作斗争,彼时N95口罩成为“必不可少的工人”的紧急必需品。亚马逊早在2月就警告市场卖家不要哄抬口罩价格,最终于3月11日限制了口罩和洗手液的销售。而KMJ公司所谓的价格欺诈发生在这些限制生效之前,是从2月24日开始的。
KMJ公司本身也使用了多个账户进行口罩销售,在三个不同的商店中提供了45种不同的产品。

3M hasn’t raised its price for N95 masks, and the US supply has been tightly controlled by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. That combination of high demand and restricted supply created the perfect conditions for price-gouging, and KMJ is far from the only company to take advantage of the situation. As part of its filing, 3M says it has filed eleven other lawsuits related to counterfeit products and price gouging during the pandemic.
3M并没有提高N95口罩的售价,美国的口罩供应也受到了联邦应急管理局的严格控制。高需求、有限供应的状况,为哄抬口罩价格创造了完美的条件,KMJ远非唯一一家利用这种状况发财的公司。3M表示,其还提出了另外11项与假冒口罩和在疫情大流行期间哄抬口罩价格有关的诉讼。
3M并没有提高N95口罩的售价,美国的口罩供应也受到了联邦应急管理局的严格控制。高需求、有限供应的状况,为哄抬口罩价格创造了完美的条件,KMJ远非唯一一家利用这种状况发财的公司。3M表示,其还提出了另外11项与假冒口罩和在疫情大流行期间哄抬口罩价格有关的诉讼。
Reached for comment, Amazon applauded the lawsuit and emphasized its anti-counterfeiting efforts on Marketplace. The company says it has removed more than 500,000 pandemic-related products from the marketplace since the outbreak began.
亚马逊对此表示赞赏,并强调了其在市场打假方面做出的努力。该公司表示,自疫情爆发以来,已从其市场上下架了50多万种与大流行相关的产品。
亚马逊对此表示赞赏,并强调了其在市场打假方面做出的努力。该公司表示,自疫情爆发以来,已从其市场上下架了50多万种与大流行相关的产品。
“We’re proud to be working with 3M to hold these bad actors accountable,” said Dharmesh Mehta, Amazon’s VP in charge of customer trust and partner support. “When we find a bad actor violating our policies, we work quickly to remove the products and take action on the bad actor, as we’ve done here, and we welcome collaboration from brands like 3M.”
亚马逊负责客户信任和合作伙伴支持的副总裁Dharmesh Mehta表示:“我们很荣幸能与3M合作,追究这些不良商家的责任。当我们发现有不良商家违反了我们的政策时,我们就会像在这里所做的那样,迅速删除产品并对这个不良商家采取措施,我们欢迎与如3M这样的品牌合作。”
亚马逊负责客户信任和合作伙伴支持的副总裁Dharmesh Mehta表示:“我们很荣幸能与3M合作,追究这些不良商家的责任。当我们发现有不良商家违反了我们的政策时,我们就会像在这里所做的那样,迅速删除产品并对这个不良商家采取措施,我们欢迎与如3M这样的品牌合作。”
3M has asked for statutory damages as high as $2 million dollars and a permanent injunction against the defendants from selling goods identified with 3M.
3M公司已要求赔偿高达200万美元的法定赔偿,并对被告发出永久禁令,禁止他们出售3M公司的产品。
3M公司已要求赔偿高达200万美元的法定赔偿,并对被告发出永久禁令,禁止他们出售3M公司的产品。
“By selling and delivering to customers counterfeit, damaged, deficient, or otherwise altered respirators and engaging in price-gouging, Defendants caused irreparable damage to 3M’s reputation,” the complaint reads. “There is no adequate remedy at law for these injuries.”
诉状状中写道:“通过向客户出售和交付假冒、损坏、缺陷或其他改装口罩,并进行价格欺诈,被告对3M公司的声誉造成了无法弥补的损害。法律上,对于这些损害没有适当的补救措施。”
诉状状中写道:“通过向客户出售和交付假冒、损坏、缺陷或其他改装口罩,并进行价格欺诈,被告对3M公司的声誉造成了无法弥补的损害。法律上,对于这些损害没有适当的补救措施。”
评论翻译
Orangish
Good. I hope they sue they sue these assholes out of existence!
很好,我希望他们起诉这帮混蛋,告到他们倒闭
Good. I hope they sue they sue these assholes out of existence!
很好,我希望他们起诉这帮混蛋,告到他们倒闭
OpssYourBad
Selling fake protective equipment should go beyond civil lawsuits, I hope they get charged criminally as well.
售价假冒防护用品应当不止是民事诉讼啊,我希望他们也能受到刑事诉讼
Selling fake protective equipment should go beyond civil lawsuits, I hope they get charged criminally as well.
售价假冒防护用品应当不止是民事诉讼啊,我希望他们也能受到刑事诉讼
darisfox
Probably Chinese or foreign shell companies, so it’s going to be a futile effort to get any compensation
可能是中国或外国的空壳公司呢,因此想要得到任何补偿都是徒劳的。
Probably Chinese or foreign shell companies, so it’s going to be a futile effort to get any compensation
可能是中国或外国的空壳公司呢,因此想要得到任何补偿都是徒劳的。
olarMane
It is a corporation organized under the laws of California by a person with a Chinese-sounding name. What that says about you is up to interpretation.
这是一家根据加州法律成立的公司,成立这家公司的人、名字听起来有点像中文。
关于你的说法还有待解释。
It is a corporation organized under the laws of California by a person with a Chinese-sounding name. What that says about you is up to interpretation.
这是一家根据加州法律成立的公司,成立这家公司的人、名字听起来有点像中文。
关于你的说法还有待解释。
number1024
Yup…heck its time they took amazon to task also and brought these shitty sellers down!
是的,见鬼,是时候把亚马逊也拖下水了,也要把这些肮脏的商家告倒。
Yup…heck its time they took amazon to task also and brought these shitty sellers down!
是的,见鬼,是时候把亚马逊也拖下水了,也要把这些肮脏的商家告倒。

number1024
This isnt the first time this has happened on Amazon and we need to question how Amazon allows 3rd parties on their site. You cannot exempt amazon from responsibility also.
这不是亚马逊第一次出现这种情况了,我们需要质疑亚马逊是如何允许第三方进入他们的网站的,你也无法免除亚马逊的责任。
This isnt the first time this has happened on Amazon and we need to question how Amazon allows 3rd parties on their site. You cannot exempt amazon from responsibility also.
这不是亚马逊第一次出现这种情况了,我们需要质疑亚马逊是如何允许第三方进入他们的网站的,你也无法免除亚马逊的责任。

---------
ssmitar2
Selling fake and huge price gouging at the same time? That’s a level beyond evil and greedy.
I hope they get royally fucked by 3M.
销售假货,同时还大幅哄抬价格,这已经不是邪恶和贪婪能形容的了
我希望他们能被3M公司狠狠地打击。
ssmitar2
Selling fake and huge price gouging at the same time? That’s a level beyond evil and greedy.
I hope they get royally fucked by 3M.
销售假货,同时还大幅哄抬价格,这已经不是邪恶和贪婪能形容的了
我希望他们能被3M公司狠狠地打击。
shabanga
Hopefully the civil suit leads to a criminal fraud indictment. This type of shit deserves prison time.
希望能由民事诉讼转变为刑事欺诈诉讼,这种垃圾就应该坐牢。
Hopefully the civil suit leads to a criminal fraud indictment. This type of shit deserves prison time.
希望能由民事诉讼转变为刑事欺诈诉讼,这种垃圾就应该坐牢。
---------
ramlongcat
I ordered some Evian water bottles a month ago and it was fake as well. The water smelled bad, the label was falling, the bottle itself was more flexible/weak than usual, etc. If you look carefully some people report it in the comments but I think overall Amazon just doesn’t care? it makes them money so I don’t think they have any incentive in doing anything… it’s sad because I love Amazon Prime — but they have some serious counterfeiting issues.
一个月前,我订购了一些依云瓶装水,也是假货,那个水很难闻,标签都掉下来了,瓶子比平时的更柔软/脆弱,如果你仔细去看,有些人会在评论中说起这个,但我认为整个亚马逊根本不在乎这事。这玩意给亚马逊赚到钱了,所以我认为亚马逊没有动机去采取任何措施。真的可悲,因为我很喜欢亚马逊Prime会员,但他们有严重的假货问题。
ramlongcat
I ordered some Evian water bottles a month ago and it was fake as well. The water smelled bad, the label was falling, the bottle itself was more flexible/weak than usual, etc. If you look carefully some people report it in the comments but I think overall Amazon just doesn’t care? it makes them money so I don’t think they have any incentive in doing anything… it’s sad because I love Amazon Prime — but they have some serious counterfeiting issues.
一个月前,我订购了一些依云瓶装水,也是假货,那个水很难闻,标签都掉下来了,瓶子比平时的更柔软/脆弱,如果你仔细去看,有些人会在评论中说起这个,但我认为整个亚马逊根本不在乎这事。这玩意给亚马逊赚到钱了,所以我认为亚马逊没有动机去采取任何措施。真的可悲,因为我很喜欢亚马逊Prime会员,但他们有严重的假货问题。
LimpingNinja
Reporting in the comments isn’t reporting. Amazon is one of the strongest companies in the US and it is by doing things that are right for consumers, not defrauding them. To assume that a few dollars on bottled water is worth them jeopardizing their business is ignorant – they are acting but I think they only way they can prevent this shit is removing 3rd party storefronts and using only Fulfilled by Amazon or Amazon supplied items.
那些评论根本就不是假冒报告,亚马逊是美国实力最强的公司之一,它所做的一切都是对消费者有利的,而不是欺骗消费者。你认为瓶装水这几块钱、值得他们去破坏自己的生意?这是无知的想法。他们在行动,但我认为唯一能防止这种情况发生的方法就是移除第三方商店,只使用亚马逊提供的商品。
Reporting in the comments isn’t reporting. Amazon is one of the strongest companies in the US and it is by doing things that are right for consumers, not defrauding them. To assume that a few dollars on bottled water is worth them jeopardizing their business is ignorant – they are acting but I think they only way they can prevent this shit is removing 3rd party storefronts and using only Fulfilled by Amazon or Amazon supplied items.
那些评论根本就不是假冒报告,亚马逊是美国实力最强的公司之一,它所做的一切都是对消费者有利的,而不是欺骗消费者。你认为瓶装水这几块钱、值得他们去破坏自己的生意?这是无知的想法。他们在行动,但我认为唯一能防止这种情况发生的方法就是移除第三方商店,只使用亚马逊提供的商品。


ramlongcat
not gonna use NYC’s brownish & stinky tap water to feed my kid — thanks
have you ever considered not judging people too quickly for once ?
我是不会用纽约那棕色、恶臭的自来水来喂我的孩子,谢谢
你有没有考虑过不要那么快地评判别人?
not gonna use NYC’s brownish & stinky tap water to feed my kid — thanks
have you ever considered not judging people too quickly for once ?
我是不会用纽约那棕色、恶臭的自来水来喂我的孩子,谢谢
你有没有考虑过不要那么快地评判别人?



----------
dot.
Why not sue Amazon? They need to police better. They implemented something a while back where you can’t sell many products without being "authorized" by the trademark owne
为什么不起诉亚马逊?他们需要制定更好的政策,不久前他们实施了一些措施:没有商标授权人的授权,有很多东西你不能出售。
dot.
Why not sue Amazon? They need to police better. They implemented something a while back where you can’t sell many products without being "authorized" by the trademark owne
为什么不起诉亚马逊?他们需要制定更好的政策,不久前他们实施了一些措施:没有商标授权人的授权,有很多东西你不能出售。
LimpingNinja
Why not sue Twitter for tweets?
为什么不以发推特为由起诉推特公司呢?
Why not sue Twitter for tweets?
为什么不以发推特为由起诉推特公司呢?
vroomvroomimabroom
One is speech, the other is goods.
YouTube was sued before it provided satisfactory copyright tools.
一个是言论,一个是商品
在提供令人满意的版权工具之前、油管也曾被起诉过
One is speech, the other is goods.
YouTube was sued before it provided satisfactory copyright tools.
一个是言论,一个是商品
在提供令人满意的版权工具之前、油管也曾被起诉过
----------
slider41
A good rule of thumb: Never, ever buy from third parties on Amazon.
我来提供一条比较好经验法则:永远不要从亚马逊第三方卖家那买东西。
slider41
A good rule of thumb: Never, ever buy from third parties on Amazon.
我来提供一条比较好经验法则:永远不要从亚马逊第三方卖家那买东西。
darisfox
Even then you’re not guaranteed to get fake as Amazon has been known to mix third party sellers stock with their own.
This is why I’m now moving most of my purchases away from Amazon where I can as I just can’t trust them. That and the item listings are flooded with cheap Chinese knock-offs making it hard to find OEM kit.
即便那样,你也无法保证不买到假货,因为众所知周的是:亚马逊将自己的仓库与第三方卖家的仓库混合在一起了
这就是为什么我现在要将大部分的购物从亚马逊抽离,我就是无法信任亚马逊。亚马逊的商品清单上充斥着廉价的中国仿制品,很难寻找到OEM产品。
Even then you’re not guaranteed to get fake as Amazon has been known to mix third party sellers stock with their own.
This is why I’m now moving most of my purchases away from Amazon where I can as I just can’t trust them. That and the item listings are flooded with cheap Chinese knock-offs making it hard to find OEM kit.
即便那样,你也无法保证不买到假货,因为众所知周的是:亚马逊将自己的仓库与第三方卖家的仓库混合在一起了
这就是为什么我现在要将大部分的购物从亚马逊抽离,我就是无法信任亚马逊。亚马逊的商品清单上充斥着廉价的中国仿制品,很难寻找到OEM产品。
number1024
It is VERY difficult to tell these days as Amazon uses third parties to provide some products. It may say from an Amazon warehouse but they are provided by a third party. Amazon needs to also be held accountable!
现在还很难说得清楚,因为亚马逊利用第三方商家、提供了一些产品。你可以说这些产品是来自于亚马逊的仓库,但它们是由第三方提供的,亚马逊也需要负起责任!
It is VERY difficult to tell these days as Amazon uses third parties to provide some products. It may say from an Amazon warehouse but they are provided by a third party. Amazon needs to also be held accountable!
现在还很难说得清楚,因为亚马逊利用第三方商家、提供了一些产品。你可以说这些产品是来自于亚马逊的仓库,但它们是由第三方提供的,亚马逊也需要负起责任!
Sorto
It tells you on products how they are fulfilled, it’s not hidden.
亚马逊会在产品上标明商品从何而来,并没有隐藏信息。
It tells you on products how they are fulfilled, it’s not hidden.
亚马逊会在产品上标明商品从何而来,并没有隐藏信息。
LimpingNinja
Exactly, I’m not sure how people miss this. It very clearly tells you who it comes from, I purchase from Amazon and from FBA products that have good ratings, simple as.
说的没错,我不知道为什么人们会错过这些信息,它非常清楚地告知了你商品从何处来,我在亚马逊和FBA上那些评级良好的商家那购买商品,简单得很。
Exactly, I’m not sure how people miss this. It very clearly tells you who it comes from, I purchase from Amazon and from FBA products that have good ratings, simple as.
说的没错,我不知道为什么人们会错过这些信息,它非常清楚地告知了你商品从何处来,我在亚马逊和FBA上那些评级良好的商家那购买商品,简单得很。
OpssYourBad
Amazon mixes stock so your strategy doesn’t work at all. As long as the seller labels it with the same SKU and it looks superficially similar, it goes into the same stock as everything else bearing the same SKU, including Amazon sold and delivered goods.
This is a well documented problem, especially if you look up discussions of fake SD cards from Amazon.
亚马逊把仓库混合了,所以你的策略根本不起作用。只要卖家标明了相同的商品属性,并且表面上看起来相似,它就会与其他所有相同属性的商品进入同一个库存,其中也包括了亚马逊自营和交付的商品。
这是一个有据可查的问题,尤其是当你查阅关于亚马逊售卖伪劣SD卡的讨论时。
Amazon mixes stock so your strategy doesn’t work at all. As long as the seller labels it with the same SKU and it looks superficially similar, it goes into the same stock as everything else bearing the same SKU, including Amazon sold and delivered goods.
This is a well documented problem, especially if you look up discussions of fake SD cards from Amazon.
亚马逊把仓库混合了,所以你的策略根本不起作用。只要卖家标明了相同的商品属性,并且表面上看起来相似,它就会与其他所有相同属性的商品进入同一个库存,其中也包括了亚马逊自营和交付的商品。
这是一个有据可查的问题,尤其是当你查阅关于亚马逊售卖伪劣SD卡的讨论时。
gdgail
Exactly this.
I sell some stuff on amazon and the Fulfilled by Amazon (FBA) is merely the seller sending in their products to be stored at a fulfillment center. I pay a monthly storage fee for my items so that they can hold and ship my products at will.
Lots of times i’ll have 10 or more of the same item, but they have me ship them to 3 or 4 different fulfillment centers around the country so the items will travel shorter distances when purchased. I’m considered 3rd party, but like they said depending on need, my items still ‘ship’ in one or two days because they have it on their shelves.
As a buyer, there’s No way to really know how Amazon acquired the product, or how they quality control what’s coming in since it’s all mostly just a bar-code scan and shelf operation.
说的一点没错
我在亚马逊上卖一些东西,而“由亚马逊提供”(FBA)的意思、仅仅意味着卖家将他们的产品发送到一个仓储中心进行存储,我每月要为我的商品支付一笔存储费用,这样他们就可以随意存放、运送我的产品了。
很多时候,我会有10件或更多的同一种商品,但亚马逊让我把它们运送到3到4个不同的仓储中心,分布在全国各地,如此一来,当商品被购买时、运输距离就会被缩短。我被认为是第三方卖家,但正如他们所说的,根据需要,我的商品仍然会在一两天内“发货”,因为商品已经在他们的货架上了。
作为一个买家,我是没有办法真正知道亚马逊是如何获得商品的,也没有办法知道他们是如何控制产品质量的,因为基本上都是一个条形码扫描和货架的操作。
Exactly this.
I sell some stuff on amazon and the Fulfilled by Amazon (FBA) is merely the seller sending in their products to be stored at a fulfillment center. I pay a monthly storage fee for my items so that they can hold and ship my products at will.
Lots of times i’ll have 10 or more of the same item, but they have me ship them to 3 or 4 different fulfillment centers around the country so the items will travel shorter distances when purchased. I’m considered 3rd party, but like they said depending on need, my items still ‘ship’ in one or two days because they have it on their shelves.
As a buyer, there’s No way to really know how Amazon acquired the product, or how they quality control what’s coming in since it’s all mostly just a bar-code scan and shelf operation.
说的一点没错
我在亚马逊上卖一些东西,而“由亚马逊提供”(FBA)的意思、仅仅意味着卖家将他们的产品发送到一个仓储中心进行存储,我每月要为我的商品支付一笔存储费用,这样他们就可以随意存放、运送我的产品了。
很多时候,我会有10件或更多的同一种商品,但亚马逊让我把它们运送到3到4个不同的仓储中心,分布在全国各地,如此一来,当商品被购买时、运输距离就会被缩短。我被认为是第三方卖家,但正如他们所说的,根据需要,我的商品仍然会在一两天内“发货”,因为商品已经在他们的货架上了。
作为一个买家,我是没有办法真正知道亚马逊是如何获得商品的,也没有办法知道他们是如何控制产品质量的,因为基本上都是一个条形码扫描和货架的操作。
number1024
Not really. I can assure you 100% that some items say fulfilled by Amazon warehouse…you DO REALISE that that small logo means it may come from a amazon hosted warehouse but its provided by third parties NOT Amazon.
I think you need to actually do some research into this. Amazon mixes products and amazon highly relies on SKU their site is very flawed.
说得不对,我可以100%地向你保证,有些所谓的“由亚马逊仓库提供”的商品,您确实会意识到、这个小标识意味着该件商品可能来自于亚马逊托管的仓库,但实际上它是由第三方提供的、而不是亚马逊。
我认为,你真的需要对此做一些研究了,亚马逊把商品进行了混合,他们高度依赖“商品信息”,他们的网站是有很大缺陷的。
Not really. I can assure you 100% that some items say fulfilled by Amazon warehouse…you DO REALISE that that small logo means it may come from a amazon hosted warehouse but its provided by third parties NOT Amazon.
I think you need to actually do some research into this. Amazon mixes products and amazon highly relies on SKU their site is very flawed.
说得不对,我可以100%地向你保证,有些所谓的“由亚马逊仓库提供”的商品,您确实会意识到、这个小标识意味着该件商品可能来自于亚马逊托管的仓库,但实际上它是由第三方提供的、而不是亚马逊。
我认为,你真的需要对此做一些研究了,亚马逊把商品进行了混合,他们高度依赖“商品信息”,他们的网站是有很大缺陷的。
slider41
Fulfilled by is not Sold by, though. I still say that one is safer sticking to Sold by Amazon if you’re going to buy on the Amazon site at all.
然而,“由亚马逊提供”并不意味着“由亚马逊出售”,我仍然认为,如果你打算在亚马逊网站上买东西,坚持使用“亚马逊出售”会更安全一些。
Fulfilled by is not Sold by, though. I still say that one is safer sticking to Sold by Amazon if you’re going to buy on the Amazon site at all.
然而,“由亚马逊提供”并不意味着“由亚马逊出售”,我仍然认为,如果你打算在亚马逊网站上买东西,坚持使用“亚马逊出售”会更安全一些。
LimpingNinja
I don’t disagree that something needs to be done, but what can Amazon do here? If they are being supplied locally to warehouses it is difficult. In retail when you get a 3P drop shipment you spot-check and if the spot-check looks good you allow it, I’m sure these fraudulent companies are probing for weaknesses constantly. They can make a tremendous mark-up by replacing 50% of their merchandise or more with knock-offs. I’m sure that Amazon and other retailers are trying their best to hinder this… do you think the only appropriate step is to not allow non-certifiied dealers? How will that help small-business 3rd parties?
我不反对需要采取一些措施,但是亚马逊能做什么呢?如果是由本地向仓库供应,这是很困难的。在零售业,当你依赖第三方的直运,你就需要进行抽查,如果抽查看起来还不错,你会允许它出售,但我相信这些欺诈公司会不断地寻找弱点,他们可以用仿冒品替换掉50%或更多的商品,从而攫取巨额利润。
我相信亚马逊和其他零售商正在尽力阻止这种情况……你认为唯一合适的措施是禁止未经认证的经销商?这对小企业第三方卖家又有何帮助呢?
I don’t disagree that something needs to be done, but what can Amazon do here? If they are being supplied locally to warehouses it is difficult. In retail when you get a 3P drop shipment you spot-check and if the spot-check looks good you allow it, I’m sure these fraudulent companies are probing for weaknesses constantly. They can make a tremendous mark-up by replacing 50% of their merchandise or more with knock-offs. I’m sure that Amazon and other retailers are trying their best to hinder this… do you think the only appropriate step is to not allow non-certifiied dealers? How will that help small-business 3rd parties?
我不反对需要采取一些措施,但是亚马逊能做什么呢?如果是由本地向仓库供应,这是很困难的。在零售业,当你依赖第三方的直运,你就需要进行抽查,如果抽查看起来还不错,你会允许它出售,但我相信这些欺诈公司会不断地寻找弱点,他们可以用仿冒品替换掉50%或更多的商品,从而攫取巨额利润。
我相信亚马逊和其他零售商正在尽力阻止这种情况……你认为唯一合适的措施是禁止未经认证的经销商?这对小企业第三方卖家又有何帮助呢?
number1024
Maybe they need to find a way to stop fake products…I mean even they can do a simple search on their own damn site and they will get hundreds of fake crap show up…what you think they dont already know!?
也许他们需要找到一种办法、来阻止假冒产品。我的意思是,即使人们可以在他们该死的网站上做一个简单的搜索,也会有成百上千的假冒垃圾冒出来…你认为亚马逊还不知道这个情况么!
Maybe they need to find a way to stop fake products…I mean even they can do a simple search on their own damn site and they will get hundreds of fake crap show up…what you think they dont already know!?
也许他们需要找到一种办法、来阻止假冒产品。我的意思是,即使人们可以在他们该死的网站上做一个简单的搜索,也会有成百上千的假冒垃圾冒出来…你认为亚马逊还不知道这个情况么!
----------
vroomvroomimabroom
I hope Amazon gets fined at some point for counterfeit goods. You have a store that makes you billions – you have the responsibility to police it.
我希望亚马逊在某个时候因为假冒商品而被罚款,既然你拥有一家能为你赚大钱的商店,你就有责任去监管它。
vroomvroomimabroom
I hope Amazon gets fined at some point for counterfeit goods. You have a store that makes you billions – you have the responsibility to police it.
我希望亚马逊在某个时候因为假冒商品而被罚款,既然你拥有一家能为你赚大钱的商店,你就有责任去监管它。
----------
albee
The problem with Amazon is that their branding creates confidence in the purchase, regardless of whether or not it’s fulfilled by a 3rd party. If they said before you buy "Remember Amazon can not guarantee this item is real and not dangerous, do you want to proceed?" then you would see sales fall dramatically. Which is something they cannot afford.
So they cant have it both ways. If they are going fulfil third party deliveries they have to do the work in policing it. Anything a brick and mortar store sales is vetted in this way, the web should be the same.
亚马逊的问题在于,无论是否由第三方提供,他们的品牌都会给买家带来信心。如果他们在你购买之前标明“记住,亚马逊无法保证这件商品是真货,也无法保证这件商品没有危险,你还想继续吗?”,然后你会看到销售额急剧下降,这是他们负担不起的。
所以他们无法两全其美,如果他们要完成第三方交付,他们就必须做监管工作,任何一个实体商店的销售、都是这样来审核的,网络销售也应当一样。
albee
The problem with Amazon is that their branding creates confidence in the purchase, regardless of whether or not it’s fulfilled by a 3rd party. If they said before you buy "Remember Amazon can not guarantee this item is real and not dangerous, do you want to proceed?" then you would see sales fall dramatically. Which is something they cannot afford.
So they cant have it both ways. If they are going fulfil third party deliveries they have to do the work in policing it. Anything a brick and mortar store sales is vetted in this way, the web should be the same.
亚马逊的问题在于,无论是否由第三方提供,他们的品牌都会给买家带来信心。如果他们在你购买之前标明“记住,亚马逊无法保证这件商品是真货,也无法保证这件商品没有危险,你还想继续吗?”,然后你会看到销售额急剧下降,这是他们负担不起的。
所以他们无法两全其美,如果他们要完成第三方交付,他们就必须做监管工作,任何一个实体商店的销售、都是这样来审核的,网络销售也应当一样。
OpssYourBad
They can’t even guarantee Amazon sold and shipped products are real. If a seller labelled their 3M masks with the same SKU as the real deal, Amazon would keep them in the same bin and people who buy Amazon sold and shipped products would potentially get those counterfeits. Amazon also has a fake review problem they’re not tackling.
他们甚至无法保证亚马逊销售和发货的产品是真品。如果一个卖家、给他们的3M口罩贴上与正品相同的商品属性标签,亚马逊就会把它们放在同一个库存里,而那些购买“由亚马逊出售和运输”产品的人,就可能会收到这些假货。亚马逊还存在虚假评论的问题,他们还没有解决。
They can’t even guarantee Amazon sold and shipped products are real. If a seller labelled their 3M masks with the same SKU as the real deal, Amazon would keep them in the same bin and people who buy Amazon sold and shipped products would potentially get those counterfeits. Amazon also has a fake review problem they’re not tackling.
他们甚至无法保证亚马逊销售和发货的产品是真品。如果一个卖家、给他们的3M口罩贴上与正品相同的商品属性标签,亚马逊就会把它们放在同一个库存里,而那些购买“由亚马逊出售和运输”产品的人,就可能会收到这些假货。亚马逊还存在虚假评论的问题,他们还没有解决。
---------
foremi
I wonder if Amazon will return the seller fees to the buyers?
Of course not, Amazon doesn’t care. They probably made more in fees than a real n95 mask and profited off this "bad actor".
我想知道,亚马逊是否会把费用退还给买家?
当然不会,亚马逊根本不在乎这事。与正品N95相比,他们可能赚到了更多的钱,而且还从不良商家那获取了利润。
foremi
I wonder if Amazon will return the seller fees to the buyers?
Of course not, Amazon doesn’t care. They probably made more in fees than a real n95 mask and profited off this "bad actor".
我想知道,亚马逊是否会把费用退还给买家?
当然不会,亚马逊根本不在乎这事。与正品N95相比,他们可能赚到了更多的钱,而且还从不良商家那获取了利润。
相关链接
-
- 亚马逊买家购买后评论 - 冥币 2020/06/15 35014 84 0
-
- 一家为特斯拉制造电池的中国公司表示,他们研发的超级电池总里程达 2020/06/10 52029 82 0
-
- 英国超市威胁称,如果巴西实施加速破坏亚马逊雨林的计划,那么超市 2020/05/25 20436 78 0
-
- 我丈夫不久将开始为一家中国公司工作。由于对中国文化不了解,他对 2020/05/05 58687 82 0
-
- 在冠状病毒疫情下的处于封城状态下的纽约市:寂静的街道和处于关门 2020/04/18 21618 13 0
-
- 英国航空公司的空客飞机与阿联酋航空的飞机在迪拜机场相撞 2020/04/16 24978 18 0
-
- 犯罪性的封锁:美国公司拦截了马云给古巴捐赠的援助物资 2020/04/09 54784 55 0
-
- 越南一家公司用厕纸制作口罩 2020/02/23 22980 79 0
该译文暂不支持评论哦