特斯拉对中国新款MODEL 3进行了硬件缩水，然后直接交付给客户
Tesla Downgrades Hardware On "New" Model 3s In China, Then Delivers Them Anyway To Unsuspecting Customers
译文简介
周二，有消息称，特斯拉由于“流行病时期的供应链状况不好”，正在“降级”其中国制造的MODEL 3型车的硬件，随后特斯拉承诺向客户免费升级。然而特斯拉并没有选择做正确的事情，即暂停生产、直到能够生产出产品；而是做它最擅长的事情：缩水。
正文翻译
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：根就是韭菜就是根 转载请注明出处
Tesla Downgrades Hardware On "New" Model 3s In China, Then Delivers Them Anyway To Unsuspecting Customers
特斯拉在中国的新版model 3上进行了硬件缩水，然后交付给毫无戒备的客户。
It looks like Tesla may have finally found a way to use up all of that old, unused inventory that''''s been sitting on the company''''s balance sheet: make new cars with old parts, and blame the coronavirus.
看起来，特斯拉可能终于找到了一种办法、来用光所有从未使用的旧库存（这些库存一直都在公司的负债表上）：用旧零件制造新车，并把锅甩到冠状病毒身上。
At least, that''''s exactly what it appears the company is doing in China, according to a recent report by Xinhua.
新华社最近的一篇报道称：至少、这正是该公司在中国的表现。
On Tuesday, the news broke that Tesla was "downgrading" hardware on its China made Model 3 due to "supply chain status amid the epidemic" and it then promised free upgrades to its customers. Instead of just doing the right thing, which would be suspending production until you can make the product property, Tesla is doing what it does best: half assing it.
周二，有消息称，特斯拉由于“流行病时期的供应链状况不好”，正在“降级”其中国制造的MODEL 3型车的硬件，随后特斯拉承诺向客户免费升级。然而特斯拉并没有选择做正确的事情，即暂停生产、直到能够生产出产品；而是做它最擅长的事情：缩水。
The report points out that some Chinese consumers were noticing that the hardware in their newly delivered Tesla vehicles was inconsistent with their orders. Tesla responded by saying that Hardware 2.5 had been installed in some vehicles that were promised Hardware 3.0.
有报道指出，一些中国消费者注意到、他们新交付的特斯拉汽车的硬件与订单显示不符。特斯拉回应说：他们将2.5版硬件安装在一些之前承诺3.0版硬件的车辆上。
Isn''''t that a nice way to find out, as a consumer, that you''''re not getting what you ordered?
作为一个消费者，这难道不是显而易见了么？你没有拿到与预定相符的产品。
Elsewhere, this would look suspiciously like a bait and switch. And it appears from Xinhua''''s report that Tesla only fessed up after consumers started to take notice. We''''d also be extremely interested in finding out when and how Tesla delivers on the promise of "free upgrades" for the customers taking delivery of their vehicles, with the wrong hardware, now.
在异国他乡，这看起来就是在诱导消费者。而从新华社的报道来看，特斯拉似乎只是在消费者开始注意到之后才有所收敛，我们也非常有兴趣了解特斯拉在何时、以及如何兑现承诺，为那些收到错误硬件版本车辆的客户提供“免费升级”的车辆。
The company''''s Gigafactory in China resumed work on Feburary 10.
该公司在中国的超级工厂已于2月10日复工。
People on social media were skeptical - to say the least. But it seems as long as Tesla''''s stock holds up, Elon Musk will continue to get away with things like this. It''''s when the tide goes out on the stock that we''''re most interested in finding out what bubbles to the surface:
至少可以说，社交媒体上的人对此持怀疑态度。但似乎只要特斯拉的股票还能撑得住，马斯克就会继续逍遥法外。当股市上涨潮之时，我们最感兴趣的、是找出那些浮出水面的泡沫
Tesla Downgrades Hardware On "New" Model 3s In China, Then Delivers Them Anyway To Unsuspecting Customers
特斯拉在中国的新版model 3上进行了硬件缩水，然后交付给毫无戒备的客户。
It looks like Tesla may have finally found a way to use up all of that old, unused inventory that''''s been sitting on the company''''s balance sheet: make new cars with old parts, and blame the coronavirus.
看起来，特斯拉可能终于找到了一种办法、来用光所有从未使用的旧库存（这些库存一直都在公司的负债表上）：用旧零件制造新车，并把锅甩到冠状病毒身上。
At least, that''''s exactly what it appears the company is doing in China, according to a recent report by Xinhua.
新华社最近的一篇报道称：至少、这正是该公司在中国的表现。
On Tuesday, the news broke that Tesla was "downgrading" hardware on its China made Model 3 due to "supply chain status amid the epidemic" and it then promised free upgrades to its customers. Instead of just doing the right thing, which would be suspending production until you can make the product property, Tesla is doing what it does best: half assing it.
周二，有消息称，特斯拉由于“流行病时期的供应链状况不好”，正在“降级”其中国制造的MODEL 3型车的硬件，随后特斯拉承诺向客户免费升级。然而特斯拉并没有选择做正确的事情，即暂停生产、直到能够生产出产品；而是做它最擅长的事情：缩水。
The report points out that some Chinese consumers were noticing that the hardware in their newly delivered Tesla vehicles was inconsistent with their orders. Tesla responded by saying that Hardware 2.5 had been installed in some vehicles that were promised Hardware 3.0.
有报道指出，一些中国消费者注意到、他们新交付的特斯拉汽车的硬件与订单显示不符。特斯拉回应说：他们将2.5版硬件安装在一些之前承诺3.0版硬件的车辆上。
Isn''''t that a nice way to find out, as a consumer, that you''''re not getting what you ordered?
作为一个消费者，这难道不是显而易见了么？你没有拿到与预定相符的产品。
Elsewhere, this would look suspiciously like a bait and switch. And it appears from Xinhua''''s report that Tesla only fessed up after consumers started to take notice. We''''d also be extremely interested in finding out when and how Tesla delivers on the promise of "free upgrades" for the customers taking delivery of their vehicles, with the wrong hardware, now.
在异国他乡，这看起来就是在诱导消费者。而从新华社的报道来看，特斯拉似乎只是在消费者开始注意到之后才有所收敛，我们也非常有兴趣了解特斯拉在何时、以及如何兑现承诺，为那些收到错误硬件版本车辆的客户提供“免费升级”的车辆。
The company''''s Gigafactory in China resumed work on Feburary 10.
该公司在中国的超级工厂已于2月10日复工。
People on social media were skeptical - to say the least. But it seems as long as Tesla''''s stock holds up, Elon Musk will continue to get away with things like this. It''''s when the tide goes out on the stock that we''''re most interested in finding out what bubbles to the surface:
至少可以说，社交媒体上的人对此持怀疑态度。但似乎只要特斯拉的股票还能撑得住，马斯克就会继续逍遥法外。当股市上涨潮之时，我们最感兴趣的、是找出那些浮出水面的泡沫
评论翻译
原创翻译：龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译：根就是韭菜就是根 转载请注明出处
Following the Bill Gates model, release a product that sucks, then issue ''''upxes'''' to get it working properly.
他跟随了比尔盖茨的模式，发布一款糟糕的产品，然后用“更新”来使其工作正常。
I get it that the Tylers are short Tesla, and any bad news is good news to them. But this is pathetic, the ''''article'''' you sourced from is typical Chinese media designed for western suckers. What hardware Tylers? If you are going to sink Tesla stock you better try harder.
我发现了，作者就是在抹黑特斯拉，任何特斯拉的坏消息对他来说都是好消息，但这是可悲的，你的“文章”的信息来源于典型的中国媒体、专门为西方傻子们设计的。你说的是什么硬件？如果你想让特斯拉的股票下跌、最好再努力一点。
--
I think Tesla is doing pretty good job on that itself. Don''''t shoot the messenger.
我认为特斯拉在处理这件事上已经做得很好了，抢不打信使。
But, but, but ...... Elon Musk is a genious.
Yeah, right.
可是，可是，可是。。。马斯克是天才呀！
是的，没错。
If any other car makers cars were catching on fire they’d be recalled.
如果其他汽车制造商的车子着火了，他们会把车子召回。
If any other car makers cars were not braking and smashing into things they’d be recalled.
You tell me what’s going on? This mother f@&$er is sponsored by some pretty fancy dudes to be getting away with this s@&t and I haven’t even started on the stock!
What dumb *** clown would buy Tesla stock unless they lived under a rock or ... they’re one of those fancy dudes I mentioned earlier.
The guy is a babbling idiot doing the bidding work of fancy dudes. That’s it. That’s all he is and that’s all his products are.
SpaceX is a load of horse s&$t. NASA outsourced space because you can’t compel a company to provide data the same way you can compel a government agency.
So why do fancy dudes want us buying/driving Tesla’s? Or why do fancy dudes want Muskrat in control of fake exploration?
Aside from the fact he’s an idiot I just can’t figure out the Tesla thing. Do the fancy dudes need funding via Tesla? Do the fancy dudes use Tesla for carbon credits? What the f&$k is Tesla really being used for?
God knows Tesla would have be shutdown long ago if it didn’t have fancy dudes up it’s ***.
如果其他汽车制造商的车子刹不住、撞车了，他们就会召回车子。
你告诉我、这是怎么回事？这个王八蛋是由一些漂亮的花花公子赞助的，我是不会碰他们的股票！
什么蠢材会去买特斯拉的股票？除非他们还没出过村。。。或者他可能是我前面提到的那些花花公子之一。
这家伙是个喋喋不休的白痴，在做一些花里胡哨的投标，就是这样的。他就是马斯克，他的产品也是这样的。
SpaceX就是一堆狗屎，NASA把项目外包给他们，是因为你不能像强迫政府机构那样强迫一家公司提供数据。
为什么那些花花公子们要让我们买/开特斯拉的车？或者为什么花花公子想让马斯克掌控这些假产业？？
我除了知道马斯克是个白痴之外、搞不懂特斯拉的任何东西。那些花花公子需要特斯拉的资助吗？那些花花公子会开特斯拉的车子、为了获得碳排放权？特斯拉到底是用来干什么的？
上帝知道、如果没有这些花花公子、特斯拉早就关门了。
Still need better batteries...
....batteries that can power the car for 1000 miles on one charge.
还需要更好的电池。。。
一次充电就能为车子提供1000英里续航的那种。
--
**** off. We need people who are willfully ignorant of the infrastructure costs and environmental costs (worse by far than IC transport), like you, to STFU.
滚犊子吧，我们需要像你这样对基础设施成本和环境成本一无所知的人闭嘴。
---
I''''m willfully ignorant of the infrastructure costs and environmental costs? ???
我对基础设施成本和环境成本一无所知？？？
A shady business, started by a shady character, that only exists as a product of regulation and subsidy by the US Sociopaths In Charge, this is not a surprise.
这就是一家阴暗的企业，由一个阴暗的人开设的，他们的存在就为了被监管然后获取补贴（由美国那些反社会的掌权者提供），这并不奇怪。
Today with over 250 million registered passenger vehicles in America if every Tesla ever made is on American roads, which they are not, only around one in three hundred cars would sport the Tesla name. Many market watchers see Tesla the "Poster Boy" of absurdity and proof of how liquidity has blown a massive bubble in equity prices.
The fact is, you either love Tesla and Musk or you don''''t. With Tesla stock soaring it is again time to revisit the "Tesla - Musk" phenomenon. The article below claims the big question is whether sanity still exists in this market.
https://The "Tesla-Musk" Phenomenon Continues To Unfold .html
如今，美国有超过2.5亿辆登记在册的乘用车，如果特斯拉的每一辆车都在美国的公路上行驶（然而并不是这样），那么每300辆车中也只有大约一辆特斯拉。许多市场观察人士都认为、特斯拉只是个荒谬的“海报男孩”而已，这证明了资产是如何被吹捧成一个巨大的泡沫的
事实是，你要么喜欢特斯拉和马斯克，要么不喜欢。随着特斯拉股票的飙升，又到了重新审视“特斯拉 -- 马斯克”现象的时候了。以下文章声称：最大的问题在于、在这个市场上是否还存在理智。
https://The "Tesla-Musk" Phenomenon Continues To Unfold .html
Elon, for some reason, is the Clowns golden boy. Who can guess why (seriously, enlighten me). But until they abandon him, he''''ll fly high regardless.
马斯克，不知为何就是一个小丑。谁能猜出为什么（我说真的，给我点提示），但直到人们抛弃他之前，他会越发风生水起。
This guy is either the greatest salesman ever or the greatest con man. If only his cars were as a good as his people skills.
这家伙要么有史以来最伟大的推销员、要么就是最伟大的骗子。要是他的车和他的交际能力一样棒就好了。
We downgraded your 2020 Tesla to a internal combustion engine.... but we''''ll correct that once we get the proper parts.
（亲爱的客户）我们将你的2020年款特斯拉汽车缩水成了内燃机。。。但一旦我们找到合适的硬件、我们就会更正的。
--
I don''''t get it with the huge trucks give me a cruiser or patrol anyday, I mean how the **** do you even turn them around on a bush track?
我也不明白那些买大车的，比如陆巡和途乐，我的意思是，你们他妈要如何在窄路上掉头？
---
I have a 4 door sport lux, a 2 seater sports car and a 1977 4x4 Chevy Blazer. The Chevy Blazer has the smallest turning *radius* and can make a complete U turn in a tighter turn than either of the other cars. Then again....a 77 Blazer probably doesn''''t qualify as one of the modern giant ''''urban cowboy'''' trucks.
我有一辆4门运动型豪华轿车，一辆2座跑车和一辆1977年的4x4雪佛兰开拓者。雪佛兰开拓者拥有最小的转弯半径，比其他任何车都能胜任U形转弯。再说一句，这是一辆77年的开拓者，可能不符合现代大型“都市牛郎”的皮卡的要求吧
Sounds like a law suit to me, regardless of the promise to upgrade to HW3. It was ordered with the published specs (HW3) and I would think it should have been delivered with that specification. If you intentionally don''''t deliver with the correct spec then that''''s a deception, or fraud, what ever way you want to look at it.
对我来说，这听起来像一场法律诉讼，不管是否承诺升级到3.0版硬件。车子在订购的时候就是3.0版的硬件，我认为车子就应该带着这种规范来交付，如果你故意不提供正确的规格，那么这就是一场骗局、或者说是诱骗，无论你怎么看这件事都一样。
I used to have a friend we were both late-twenties/early thirties. Both married, I had kids but he had none. Around 1985 we both went to buy new cars. He bought a Buick, a great big old whale of thing that felt like steering a boat. I opted for a Chevy Blazer that was more suitable for kids aged about 6 and 8 that did outdoorsy sort of stuff, like camping and dirt bike riding.
I could never come up with the thought process that persuaded Tim to buy a Buick which at the time was an old man''''s car, with a mean average age of purchase of people over 60. He tired several times to explain to me, but I could never understand it, he was like an alien talking to me.
I feel the same about Tesla. What are the cunts who drive them thinking about when they buy them? Is it a suicidal ideation hoping for self immolation?
我曾经有一个朋友，我们都是20多岁、30出头的样子，我俩都结婚了，我有孩子，但他还没有孩子。那是1985年左右，我们都去买新车了，他买了一辆别克、一辆大老爷车，感觉就像在开一艘船。我选择了雪佛兰开拓者，更适合6岁和8岁左右的孩子搭乘、进行户外活动，如野营和山地自行车骑行。
我一直想不明白为啥Tim要买一辆别克，那辆别克在当时是老年人开的车子，平均购买年龄在60岁以上。他有几次试图试图向我解释，但我一直没能明白，我感觉他就是个外星人。
而我对特斯拉也有一样的感觉，那些开特斯拉的碧池们买车的时候在想什么呢？.........
--
I''''m buying a Cybertruck so I can have a full tank (battery) every morning when I step out to my garage and no need for oil changes. I spend a lot of time changing oil, filling tanks, and swapping brake pads. I get that time back with an EV.
我就要买一辆Cybertruck了，每天早上我踏进车库、它都是满油（电池），不需要换机油。换机油、加油、换刹车片花了我大量的时间。开上电动车我就能省下那些时间。
---
You do (maybe) unless the power is down, then you don''''t get anything.
I drive a lot and have four misc vehicles and working on another one (a project) and I don''''t do a lot of the maintenance you mentioned, I change oil every 7500 miles (synth), I fill my tank pretty much every 800-950 miles (diesel) and I have never done a brake job before 50k miles.
So I don''''t understand how paying an outrageous price for something that literally looks like a cut down shoe box on wheels (i.e. ugly as sin) gets you anything but a vehicle that 1) cost a lot 2) has no service / repair facility at all and most importantly 3) has a power train that is vulnerable to outages in our very old and rickety power grid. And that doesn''''t even touch on the fact that these seem to have a very sketchy battery system that may catch on fire just sitting in the garage!!
To me that smells a lot like disaster or at the very least misspent money. And I would encourage you to tell your household insurer that you have one because I''''m almost positive they''''ll want to adjust the rates on your house to reflect that you have a possible fire starter in the garage.
在没停电的情况下，你确实能节省时间，如果停电你就完犊子了
我经常开车，我有四辆车，正准备买第五辆（计划），你说的维护工作、我并没有做过很多，我每7500英里换一次机油，几乎每800-950英里才需要加一次油，五万公里内从来就从来没有换过刹车片。
所以我不明白，为什么要花这么大的代价、去买一辆看起来像是轮子上挂了个破鞋盒的车（丑得简直罪恶），你啥都买到了、唯独这根本不是一辆车。
1）价格昂贵2）根本没有服务/维修设施，最重要的是3）由于我们老掉牙且摇摇欲坠的电网、这车的电力系统极容易发生故障。我甚至还没说到这样一个事实，即这车似乎有一个非常粗糙的电池系统，可能会着火、或者就是只能停在车库里！！
对我来说，这听起来很像是一场灾难，至少是浪费钱。我建议你告诉你的家庭保险公司、说你有一台特斯拉，因为我几乎可以肯定、保险公司会想调整你的房子的费率，因为这反映了你家车库中有一桶火药。
----
You make a valid point about power. The longest I''''ve been without power in my life is 22 hours. The longest I''''ve had to go without being able to buy gas is a week.
Neither is the time investment I''''m talking about though. The biggest time I''''m getting back is the twice-a-week trip to the speedway where I spend somewhere between $30-$50 to fill up the tank. It''''s a huge amount of time.
你对电力的观点是对的，但我一生中遇到过最长时间的停电是22小时，而我加不到油的最长时间是一星期。
至于我说过的“对时间的投资”、你的观点也不对，我能赚回来的最长时间、是每周两次上高速、花上30-50美元加一箱油，这是相当多的时间了。
---
If you spend a lot of time changing oil and brake pads....you''''re doing it wrong....lmfao. It''''s like 20 minutes, and twice a year for oil and once a year for brake pads, so...maybe....at most 2-3 hours per year. It sounds like it''''s just an excuse to be lazy and irresponsible. EV''''s will still have maintenance requirements, just different ones...and you''''ll still have suspension, and tires...oh and bumpers that fall off because they don''''t drain water or road dirt, because no one is looking underneath your car to make sure you don''''t have sand/dirt build up....lmao.
Sounds like Can-Am at my shop.
Overpriced junk, and dummies lined up to buy it.
Big mistake it''''s over priced and overcomplicated, but as a powersports technician Can-Am junk is job security.
Tesla is just as stupid, but plenty of suckers have money.
听起来就像我店里的那辆Can-Am
一辆价格过高的垃圾，还有很多傻子排着队去买
最大的错误是这车的价格过高、过于复杂，但作为一个powersports技术人员，Can-Am这件垃圾、能保证我不会失业。
特斯拉也一样愚蠢，但很多笨蛋就是有钱。
Following the Bill Gates model, release a product that sucks, then issue ''''upxes'''' to get it working properly.
他跟随了比尔盖茨的模式，发布一款糟糕的产品，然后用“更新”来使其工作正常。
I get it that the Tylers are short Tesla, and any bad news is good news to them. But this is pathetic, the ''''article'''' you sourced from is typical Chinese media designed for western suckers. What hardware Tylers? If you are going to sink Tesla stock you better try harder.
我发现了，作者就是在抹黑特斯拉，任何特斯拉的坏消息对他来说都是好消息，但这是可悲的，你的“文章”的信息来源于典型的中国媒体、专门为西方傻子们设计的。你说的是什么硬件？如果你想让特斯拉的股票下跌、最好再努力一点。
--
I think Tesla is doing pretty good job on that itself. Don''''t shoot the messenger.
我认为特斯拉在处理这件事上已经做得很好了，抢不打信使。
But, but, but ...... Elon Musk is a genious.
Yeah, right.
可是，可是，可是。。。马斯克是天才呀！
是的，没错。
If any other car makers cars were catching on fire they’d be recalled.
如果其他汽车制造商的车子着火了，他们会把车子召回。
If any other car makers cars were not braking and smashing into things they’d be recalled.
You tell me what’s going on? This mother f@&$er is sponsored by some pretty fancy dudes to be getting away with this s@&t and I haven’t even started on the stock!
What dumb *** clown would buy Tesla stock unless they lived under a rock or ... they’re one of those fancy dudes I mentioned earlier.
The guy is a babbling idiot doing the bidding work of fancy dudes. That’s it. That’s all he is and that’s all his products are.
SpaceX is a load of horse s&$t. NASA outsourced space because you can’t compel a company to provide data the same way you can compel a government agency.
So why do fancy dudes want us buying/driving Tesla’s? Or why do fancy dudes want Muskrat in control of fake exploration?
Aside from the fact he’s an idiot I just can’t figure out the Tesla thing. Do the fancy dudes need funding via Tesla? Do the fancy dudes use Tesla for carbon credits? What the f&$k is Tesla really being used for?
God knows Tesla would have be shutdown long ago if it didn’t have fancy dudes up it’s ***.
如果其他汽车制造商的车子刹不住、撞车了，他们就会召回车子。
你告诉我、这是怎么回事？这个王八蛋是由一些漂亮的花花公子赞助的，我是不会碰他们的股票！
什么蠢材会去买特斯拉的股票？除非他们还没出过村。。。或者他可能是我前面提到的那些花花公子之一。
这家伙是个喋喋不休的白痴，在做一些花里胡哨的投标，就是这样的。他就是马斯克，他的产品也是这样的。
SpaceX就是一堆狗屎，NASA把项目外包给他们，是因为你不能像强迫政府机构那样强迫一家公司提供数据。
为什么那些花花公子们要让我们买/开特斯拉的车？或者为什么花花公子想让马斯克掌控这些假产业？？
我除了知道马斯克是个白痴之外、搞不懂特斯拉的任何东西。那些花花公子需要特斯拉的资助吗？那些花花公子会开特斯拉的车子、为了获得碳排放权？特斯拉到底是用来干什么的？
上帝知道、如果没有这些花花公子、特斯拉早就关门了。
Still need better batteries...
....batteries that can power the car for 1000 miles on one charge.
还需要更好的电池。。。
一次充电就能为车子提供1000英里续航的那种。
--
**** off. We need people who are willfully ignorant of the infrastructure costs and environmental costs (worse by far than IC transport), like you, to STFU.
滚犊子吧，我们需要像你这样对基础设施成本和环境成本一无所知的人闭嘴。
---
I''''m willfully ignorant of the infrastructure costs and environmental costs? ???
我对基础设施成本和环境成本一无所知？？？
A shady business, started by a shady character, that only exists as a product of regulation and subsidy by the US Sociopaths In Charge, this is not a surprise.
这就是一家阴暗的企业，由一个阴暗的人开设的，他们的存在就为了被监管然后获取补贴（由美国那些反社会的掌权者提供），这并不奇怪。
Today with over 250 million registered passenger vehicles in America if every Tesla ever made is on American roads, which they are not, only around one in three hundred cars would sport the Tesla name. Many market watchers see Tesla the "Poster Boy" of absurdity and proof of how liquidity has blown a massive bubble in equity prices.
The fact is, you either love Tesla and Musk or you don''''t. With Tesla stock soaring it is again time to revisit the "Tesla - Musk" phenomenon. The article below claims the big question is whether sanity still exists in this market.
https://The "Tesla-Musk" Phenomenon Continues To Unfold .html
如今，美国有超过2.5亿辆登记在册的乘用车，如果特斯拉的每一辆车都在美国的公路上行驶（然而并不是这样），那么每300辆车中也只有大约一辆特斯拉。许多市场观察人士都认为、特斯拉只是个荒谬的“海报男孩”而已，这证明了资产是如何被吹捧成一个巨大的泡沫的
事实是，你要么喜欢特斯拉和马斯克，要么不喜欢。随着特斯拉股票的飙升，又到了重新审视“特斯拉 -- 马斯克”现象的时候了。以下文章声称：最大的问题在于、在这个市场上是否还存在理智。
https://The "Tesla-Musk" Phenomenon Continues To Unfold .html
Elon, for some reason, is the Clowns golden boy. Who can guess why (seriously, enlighten me). But until they abandon him, he''''ll fly high regardless.
马斯克，不知为何就是一个小丑。谁能猜出为什么（我说真的，给我点提示），但直到人们抛弃他之前，他会越发风生水起。
This guy is either the greatest salesman ever or the greatest con man. If only his cars were as a good as his people skills.
这家伙要么有史以来最伟大的推销员、要么就是最伟大的骗子。要是他的车和他的交际能力一样棒就好了。
We downgraded your 2020 Tesla to a internal combustion engine.... but we''''ll correct that once we get the proper parts.
（亲爱的客户）我们将你的2020年款特斯拉汽车缩水成了内燃机。。。但一旦我们找到合适的硬件、我们就会更正的。
--
I don''''t get it with the huge trucks give me a cruiser or patrol anyday, I mean how the **** do you even turn them around on a bush track?
我也不明白那些买大车的，比如陆巡和途乐，我的意思是，你们他妈要如何在窄路上掉头？
---
I have a 4 door sport lux, a 2 seater sports car and a 1977 4x4 Chevy Blazer. The Chevy Blazer has the smallest turning *radius* and can make a complete U turn in a tighter turn than either of the other cars. Then again....a 77 Blazer probably doesn''''t qualify as one of the modern giant ''''urban cowboy'''' trucks.
我有一辆4门运动型豪华轿车，一辆2座跑车和一辆1977年的4x4雪佛兰开拓者。雪佛兰开拓者拥有最小的转弯半径，比其他任何车都能胜任U形转弯。再说一句，这是一辆77年的开拓者，可能不符合现代大型“都市牛郎”的皮卡的要求吧
Sounds like a law suit to me, regardless of the promise to upgrade to HW3. It was ordered with the published specs (HW3) and I would think it should have been delivered with that specification. If you intentionally don''''t deliver with the correct spec then that''''s a deception, or fraud, what ever way you want to look at it.
对我来说，这听起来像一场法律诉讼，不管是否承诺升级到3.0版硬件。车子在订购的时候就是3.0版的硬件，我认为车子就应该带着这种规范来交付，如果你故意不提供正确的规格，那么这就是一场骗局、或者说是诱骗，无论你怎么看这件事都一样。
I used to have a friend we were both late-twenties/early thirties. Both married, I had kids but he had none. Around 1985 we both went to buy new cars. He bought a Buick, a great big old whale of thing that felt like steering a boat. I opted for a Chevy Blazer that was more suitable for kids aged about 6 and 8 that did outdoorsy sort of stuff, like camping and dirt bike riding.
I could never come up with the thought process that persuaded Tim to buy a Buick which at the time was an old man''''s car, with a mean average age of purchase of people over 60. He tired several times to explain to me, but I could never understand it, he was like an alien talking to me.
I feel the same about Tesla. What are the cunts who drive them thinking about when they buy them? Is it a suicidal ideation hoping for self immolation?
我曾经有一个朋友，我们都是20多岁、30出头的样子，我俩都结婚了，我有孩子，但他还没有孩子。那是1985年左右，我们都去买新车了，他买了一辆别克、一辆大老爷车，感觉就像在开一艘船。我选择了雪佛兰开拓者，更适合6岁和8岁左右的孩子搭乘、进行户外活动，如野营和山地自行车骑行。
我一直想不明白为啥Tim要买一辆别克，那辆别克在当时是老年人开的车子，平均购买年龄在60岁以上。他有几次试图试图向我解释，但我一直没能明白，我感觉他就是个外星人。
而我对特斯拉也有一样的感觉，那些开特斯拉的碧池们买车的时候在想什么呢？.........
--
I''''m buying a Cybertruck so I can have a full tank (battery) every morning when I step out to my garage and no need for oil changes. I spend a lot of time changing oil, filling tanks, and swapping brake pads. I get that time back with an EV.
我就要买一辆Cybertruck了，每天早上我踏进车库、它都是满油（电池），不需要换机油。换机油、加油、换刹车片花了我大量的时间。开上电动车我就能省下那些时间。
---
You do (maybe) unless the power is down, then you don''''t get anything.
I drive a lot and have four misc vehicles and working on another one (a project) and I don''''t do a lot of the maintenance you mentioned, I change oil every 7500 miles (synth), I fill my tank pretty much every 800-950 miles (diesel) and I have never done a brake job before 50k miles.
So I don''''t understand how paying an outrageous price for something that literally looks like a cut down shoe box on wheels (i.e. ugly as sin) gets you anything but a vehicle that 1) cost a lot 2) has no service / repair facility at all and most importantly 3) has a power train that is vulnerable to outages in our very old and rickety power grid. And that doesn''''t even touch on the fact that these seem to have a very sketchy battery system that may catch on fire just sitting in the garage!!
To me that smells a lot like disaster or at the very least misspent money. And I would encourage you to tell your household insurer that you have one because I''''m almost positive they''''ll want to adjust the rates on your house to reflect that you have a possible fire starter in the garage.
在没停电的情况下，你确实能节省时间，如果停电你就完犊子了
我经常开车，我有四辆车，正准备买第五辆（计划），你说的维护工作、我并没有做过很多，我每7500英里换一次机油，几乎每800-950英里才需要加一次油，五万公里内从来就从来没有换过刹车片。
所以我不明白，为什么要花这么大的代价、去买一辆看起来像是轮子上挂了个破鞋盒的车（丑得简直罪恶），你啥都买到了、唯独这根本不是一辆车。
1）价格昂贵2）根本没有服务/维修设施，最重要的是3）由于我们老掉牙且摇摇欲坠的电网、这车的电力系统极容易发生故障。我甚至还没说到这样一个事实，即这车似乎有一个非常粗糙的电池系统，可能会着火、或者就是只能停在车库里！！
对我来说，这听起来很像是一场灾难，至少是浪费钱。我建议你告诉你的家庭保险公司、说你有一台特斯拉，因为我几乎可以肯定、保险公司会想调整你的房子的费率，因为这反映了你家车库中有一桶火药。
----
You make a valid point about power. The longest I''''ve been without power in my life is 22 hours. The longest I''''ve had to go without being able to buy gas is a week.
Neither is the time investment I''''m talking about though. The biggest time I''''m getting back is the twice-a-week trip to the speedway where I spend somewhere between $30-$50 to fill up the tank. It''''s a huge amount of time.
你对电力的观点是对的，但我一生中遇到过最长时间的停电是22小时，而我加不到油的最长时间是一星期。
至于我说过的“对时间的投资”、你的观点也不对，我能赚回来的最长时间、是每周两次上高速、花上30-50美元加一箱油，这是相当多的时间了。
---
If you spend a lot of time changing oil and brake pads....you''''re doing it wrong....lmfao. It''''s like 20 minutes, and twice a year for oil and once a year for brake pads, so...maybe....at most 2-3 hours per year. It sounds like it''''s just an excuse to be lazy and irresponsible. EV''''s will still have maintenance requirements, just different ones...and you''''ll still have suspension, and tires...oh and bumpers that fall off because they don''''t drain water or road dirt, because no one is looking underneath your car to make sure you don''''t have sand/dirt build up....lmao.
Sounds like Can-Am at my shop.
Overpriced junk, and dummies lined up to buy it.
Big mistake it''''s over priced and overcomplicated, but as a powersports technician Can-Am junk is job security.
Tesla is just as stupid, but plenty of suckers have money.
听起来就像我店里的那辆Can-Am
一辆价格过高的垃圾，还有很多傻子排着队去买
最大的错误是这车的价格过高、过于复杂，但作为一个powersports技术人员，Can-Am这件垃圾、能保证我不会失业。
特斯拉也一样愚蠢，但很多笨蛋就是有钱。
相关链接
-
- 我该如何礼貌地拒绝中国人用筷子往我碗里夹菜呢？他们为什么要这么 2020/03/09 38325 229 0
-
- 中国的古代科举考试有多难？ 2020/03/08 47136 308 0
-
- 为什么中国能建造自己的太空站？ 2020/03/05 38381 75 0
-
- 中国将于今年3月和5月再发射2颗北斗导航卫星以应对 GPS 挑战 2020/03/05 37798 86 0
-
- 中国人平时做的最有中国特色的事情是什么？ 2020/03/01 37396 44 0
-
- 作为一个外国人，你第一次来到中国时最让你感到惊讶的是什么? 2020/02/28 52238 232 0
-
- 欧盟圈：你们国家是如何看待中国游客的？ 2020/02/27 36113 98 0
-
- 有哪些中国社会可以被接受但在日本却令人恐惧的事？ 2020/02/26 50947 167 0
闽公网安备 35020302001346号
该译文暂不支持评论哦