
译文简介
非营利性全球政策智库兰德公司模拟了战争场景,目的是测试美国将如何应对其他主要军事超级大国
译文来源
原文地址:https://www.dailymail.co.uk
正文翻译
原创翻译:龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译:chuhao123 转载请注明出处
America gets its ‘ass handed to it’ in WW3 simulations: U.S. forces are defeated by Russia and China in almost all scenarios, analysts warn
美国在三战模拟中被“狠狠修理了”:分析人士警告美国军队几乎在所有情况下都被俄罗斯和中国击败

Nonprofit global policy think tank RAND performs simulated war scenarios to test how the US would fare against other leading military superpowers
非营利性全球政策智库兰德公司模拟了战争场景,目的是测试美国将如何应对其他主要军事超级大国
The simulations cover battle on land, at sea, in the air, space and cyberspace
模拟包括陆地、海上、空中、太空和网络空间的战斗
Analysts warned last week that the US loses to Russia or China in most scenarios
分析人士上周警告称,在大多数情况下,美国都会输给俄罗斯或中国
However, they said it would take just $24billion annually to improve outcomes
然而,他们表示,每年只需要240亿美元就可以改善结果

'In our games, when we fight Russia and China, "blue" gets its ass handed to it,' researcher David Ochmanek explained at the Center for a New American Security on Thursday, Breaking Defense first reported. American forces are generally color-coded in blue in the simulations.
周四,研究人员David Ochmanek在美国新安全中心解释说:“在我们的模拟游戏中,当我们与俄罗斯和中国作战时,蓝军吃了一个下马威。”在模拟中,美军通常用蓝色表示。
'We lose a lot of people. We lose a lot of equipment. We usually fail to achieve our obxtive of preventing aggression by the adversary,' Ochmanek added.
Ochmanek补充说:“我们损失了很多人。我们损失了很多设备。我们通常无法实现阻止敌人侵略的目标。”
Though hypothetical, the simulated games warn that the world order America has fought to protect for more than a century could be at risk.
尽管只是假设,但模拟游戏警告称,美国极力保护了一个多世纪的世界秩序可能面临风险。
The simulated conflicts take place in all five domains of battle: land, sea, air, space and cyberspace.
模拟冲突包含了所有五个领域的战斗:陆地,海洋,空中,太空和网络空间。
Accord to RAND, 'red' aggressor forces frequently burn US military bases to the ground, sink warships and take out cyber systems.
根据兰德公司的说法,“红军”侵略者经常将美国的军事基地夷为平地,击沉军舰,摧毁网络系统。
Robert Work, a former deputy secretary of defense and experienced war-gamer, explained that America's F-35 fighter jet is the most advanced of its kind in the sky, but is vulnerable on the tarmac.
前国防部副部长、经验丰富的战争游戏玩家Robert Work解释说,美国的F-35战斗机是空中同类战机中最先进的,但在停机坪上却很脆弱。
'In every case I know of, the F-35 rules the sky when it's in the sky,' Work said Thursday. 'But it gets killed on the ground in large numbers.'
沃克周四说:“据我所知,F-35在天空中的时候都能统治天空。但它在地面上时会被大量消灭。”

'These are the things that the war games show over and over and over, so we need a new American way of war without question,' Work said.
Work说:“这些都是战争游戏一遍又一遍地展示的结果,所以毫无疑问,我们美国需要一种新的战争方式。”
Work and Ochmanek's bleak observations mirror the findings of an assessment carried out last fall by the National Defense Strategy Commission, a bipartisan panel of experts sexted by Congress to uate America's National Defense Strategy.
Work和Ochmanek悲观的观察结果,与国防战略委员会去年秋天进行的一项评估形成呼应,该委员会是国会选出的两党专家组成的评估美国国防战略的小组。
'If the United States had to fight Russia in a Baltic contingency or China in a war over Taiwan, Americans could face a decisive military defeat,' the Commission said in a November report.
该委员会在11月份的一份报告中说:“如果美国被迫在波罗的海突发事件中与俄罗斯作战,或者在台湾问题上与中国作战,美国人可能会面临决定性的军事失败。”
The report highlighted how the US has lost its military edge as rival powers, namely Russia and China, have developed a 'suite of advanced capabilities heretofore possessed only by the United States'.
报告强调,随着俄罗斯和中国等竞争对手开发出“迄今只有美国拥有的一系列先进能力”,美国已失去了军事优势。
It came to the alarming conclusion that the US is 'at greater risk than at any time in decades'.
报告得出了一个令人震惊的结论:“美国面临的风险比几十年来任何时候都要大。”

Ochmanek said that adding $24billion to the budget 'for the next five years would be a good expenditure' to prepare the US for World War III, which he predicts is at least 10 to 20 years down the road.
Ochmanek说,“在未来五年的预算中增加240亿美元将是一笔不错的开支”,可以让美国为第三次世界大战做好准备。他预测,未来至少10-20年的某个时候就会发生大战。
America gets its ‘ass handed to it’ in WW3 simulations: U.S. forces are defeated by Russia and China in almost all scenarios, analysts warn
美国在三战模拟中被“狠狠修理了”:分析人士警告美国军队几乎在所有情况下都被俄罗斯和中国击败

Nonprofit global policy think tank RAND performs simulated war scenarios to test how the US would fare against other leading military superpowers
非营利性全球政策智库兰德公司模拟了战争场景,目的是测试美国将如何应对其他主要军事超级大国
The simulations cover battle on land, at sea, in the air, space and cyberspace
模拟包括陆地、海上、空中、太空和网络空间的战斗
Analysts warned last week that the US loses to Russia or China in most scenarios
分析人士上周警告称,在大多数情况下,美国都会输给俄罗斯或中国
However, they said it would take just $24billion annually to improve outcomes
然而,他们表示,每年只需要240亿美元就可以改善结果

'In our games, when we fight Russia and China, "blue" gets its ass handed to it,' researcher David Ochmanek explained at the Center for a New American Security on Thursday, Breaking Defense first reported. American forces are generally color-coded in blue in the simulations.
周四,研究人员David Ochmanek在美国新安全中心解释说:“在我们的模拟游戏中,当我们与俄罗斯和中国作战时,蓝军吃了一个下马威。”在模拟中,美军通常用蓝色表示。
'We lose a lot of people. We lose a lot of equipment. We usually fail to achieve our obxtive of preventing aggression by the adversary,' Ochmanek added.
Ochmanek补充说:“我们损失了很多人。我们损失了很多设备。我们通常无法实现阻止敌人侵略的目标。”
Though hypothetical, the simulated games warn that the world order America has fought to protect for more than a century could be at risk.
尽管只是假设,但模拟游戏警告称,美国极力保护了一个多世纪的世界秩序可能面临风险。
The simulated conflicts take place in all five domains of battle: land, sea, air, space and cyberspace.
模拟冲突包含了所有五个领域的战斗:陆地,海洋,空中,太空和网络空间。
Accord to RAND, 'red' aggressor forces frequently burn US military bases to the ground, sink warships and take out cyber systems.
根据兰德公司的说法,“红军”侵略者经常将美国的军事基地夷为平地,击沉军舰,摧毁网络系统。
Robert Work, a former deputy secretary of defense and experienced war-gamer, explained that America's F-35 fighter jet is the most advanced of its kind in the sky, but is vulnerable on the tarmac.
前国防部副部长、经验丰富的战争游戏玩家Robert Work解释说,美国的F-35战斗机是空中同类战机中最先进的,但在停机坪上却很脆弱。
'In every case I know of, the F-35 rules the sky when it's in the sky,' Work said Thursday. 'But it gets killed on the ground in large numbers.'
沃克周四说:“据我所知,F-35在天空中的时候都能统治天空。但它在地面上时会被大量消灭。”

'These are the things that the war games show over and over and over, so we need a new American way of war without question,' Work said.
Work说:“这些都是战争游戏一遍又一遍地展示的结果,所以毫无疑问,我们美国需要一种新的战争方式。”
Work and Ochmanek's bleak observations mirror the findings of an assessment carried out last fall by the National Defense Strategy Commission, a bipartisan panel of experts sexted by Congress to uate America's National Defense Strategy.
Work和Ochmanek悲观的观察结果,与国防战略委员会去年秋天进行的一项评估形成呼应,该委员会是国会选出的两党专家组成的评估美国国防战略的小组。
'If the United States had to fight Russia in a Baltic contingency or China in a war over Taiwan, Americans could face a decisive military defeat,' the Commission said in a November report.
该委员会在11月份的一份报告中说:“如果美国被迫在波罗的海突发事件中与俄罗斯作战,或者在台湾问题上与中国作战,美国人可能会面临决定性的军事失败。”
The report highlighted how the US has lost its military edge as rival powers, namely Russia and China, have developed a 'suite of advanced capabilities heretofore possessed only by the United States'.
报告强调,随着俄罗斯和中国等竞争对手开发出“迄今只有美国拥有的一系列先进能力”,美国已失去了军事优势。
It came to the alarming conclusion that the US is 'at greater risk than at any time in decades'.
报告得出了一个令人震惊的结论:“美国面临的风险比几十年来任何时候都要大。”

Ochmanek said that adding $24billion to the budget 'for the next five years would be a good expenditure' to prepare the US for World War III, which he predicts is at least 10 to 20 years down the road.
Ochmanek说,“在未来五年的预算中增加240亿美元将是一笔不错的开支”,可以让美国为第三次世界大战做好准备。他预测,未来至少10-20年的某个时候就会发生大战。
评论翻译
原创翻译:龙腾网 http://www.ltaaa.com 翻译:chuhao123 转载请注明出处
Rickjames
Obama did his best to destroy our military. Thank a God that Trump is building it back up again.
奥巴马拼尽全力的摧毁我们的军队。谢天谢地,特朗普正在将其修复回来。
illuminated_one
Destroy your military? Have you any idea what was spent on the military during the Obama administration? Almost SIX TRILLION dollars. Wouldn't you rather spend a fraction of that money on healthcare that doesn't bankrupt you if you suffer serious illness?
摧毁你们的军队?你知道奥巴马任内在军事方面花了多少钱吗?几乎6万亿美元。你们难道不能把那笔钱的零头花在医保上,这样当你们得了重病,就不会陷入破产?

Yourenotfunny
Maybe they could use those flower power new age types who protested Vietnam in the 60s... The media managed to convince everyone that that was what all young people were like back then too. Things never change but people have incredibly short memories when they want to...
也许他们可以利用那些爱与和平的新一代,那些人曾在60年代抗议越战……媒体当时成功地说服了所有人,说那时候所有的年轻人都是这样的。事情永远不会改变,但是当人们想要改变的时候,他们的记忆力却短的惊人……
pepsiumar
War involves human. You cannot predict humans. No computer can.
战争涉及到人类。你无法预测人类。任何电脑都做不到。
Yabba_Dabba_Dooo
@Mad...didn't the UK fight a little war called the 100 years war? Obviously it wasn't 100 years but I just find it ironic that a Brit wants to lecture the US about wars when you guys couldn't get along with ANYONE in Europe from the very beginning of your existence until the end of WW2.
@Mad...英国是不是打过一场叫做白年战争的小小的战争?很显然它不是一百年,但我刚刚发现了一个讽刺的地方,你们从一开始就跟欧洲的任何国家都合不来,直到二战末,在这种情况下,一个英国人竟然在对美国进行战争方面的说教。
illuminated_one
Humans are the most predictable creatures on the planet, especially neo cons.
人类是地球上最容易预测的生物,尤其是新保守党。
Steve-pa
We still have thousands of atomic warheads. I'm not scared
我们依然有成千上万的核弹头,我不害怕。
Tofana
Trident doesn't have codes, you idiot.
三叉戟没有密码,你个白痴。
illuminated_one
So does Russia................................and China has a few hundred.
俄罗斯也一样……中国也有几百个。
Peter Trzop
Lol, this was a good laugh
lol,这条新闻真好笑。
Dirty Laundry
Aw Lawz! This is serious bizness! Where's dat rascal cat Tom? Toooommm! We done got mice in da house! (Some of you will fall for any hysteria and it's making the rest of us sick of you.)
这件事很严肃!那只流氓汤姆猫哪里去了?汤昂昂昂姆!我们家里出老鼠了!(你们中的一些人会陷入歇斯底里,让我们其他人讨厌你们。)
danidin
The purpose of this report is to attempt to justify the added $24 billion the US military is angling for..
这份报告的目的就是为美国军方谋求额外的240亿军费辩护……

Jelly-Bean-Jon
@Bikbon~ Their idea of "society continuation" is all those in charge survive, they don't have a plan for the people who actually do the work.
他们的“社会存续”的意思是所有掌权的人能活下去,他们并没有给那些真正干活的人制定计划。
Frank W. Smith
About as believable as CNN.
这篇文章跟CNN一样可信。
illuminated_one
Or the BBC.
或者是BBC。
weavy11
Real warr events are more different than some computer generated data. All nonsense.
真实的战争事件与计算机生成的数据有很大的不同。全都是无稽之谈。
notafraidofthem
Yeah, if this had any truth to it, it would never be allowed to be printed. Most likely some reverse psychological propaganda.
是的,如果有什么真实性的话,它就永远不会获准出版。很可能是一些反向心理宣传。
Left.and.uphill
That's right. Just look how Vietnam crushed America
说得对,只需要看看越南是如何击败美国的。
Lazybum2
Don't write off the 2nd Amendment.
不要取消第二修正案。
Chris
It's downright pointless ignoring the EU as we're not just on Russias doorstep but we're ailed and militarily fortified with US hardware/troops. Do they want us to believe 120 million Russians with a minuscule economy and military budget the size of Tesco's produce budget is going to defeat 850 million people with a budget hundreds of times larger?
这份报告毫无意义,它无视了欧盟,因为我们不仅站在俄罗斯的家门口,而且我们还结盟了,并且在军事方面用美国的硬件/部队加强了。1.2亿俄国人凭借微不足道的经济和军事预算——跟特斯科的生产预算差不多,能打败拥有几百倍预算的8.5亿人?他们难道想让我们相信这种说法?
Nehemiah Scudder
@Chris,America has been tearing up every agreement it ever signed,and insulting its allies at every opportunity .America may well find those allies tearing up their agreements at a time most inconvenient to the USA.
美国撕毁了它曾经签署的每一份协议,并利用一切机会侮辱它的盟友。美国很可能会发现,那些盟友在美国最不舒服的时候撕毁协议。
Rickjames
Obama did his best to destroy our military. Thank a God that Trump is building it back up again.
奥巴马拼尽全力的摧毁我们的军队。谢天谢地,特朗普正在将其修复回来。
illuminated_one
Destroy your military? Have you any idea what was spent on the military during the Obama administration? Almost SIX TRILLION dollars. Wouldn't you rather spend a fraction of that money on healthcare that doesn't bankrupt you if you suffer serious illness?
摧毁你们的军队?你知道奥巴马任内在军事方面花了多少钱吗?几乎6万亿美元。你们难道不能把那笔钱的零头花在医保上,这样当你们得了重病,就不会陷入破产?

Yourenotfunny
Maybe they could use those flower power new age types who protested Vietnam in the 60s... The media managed to convince everyone that that was what all young people were like back then too. Things never change but people have incredibly short memories when they want to...
也许他们可以利用那些爱与和平的新一代,那些人曾在60年代抗议越战……媒体当时成功地说服了所有人,说那时候所有的年轻人都是这样的。事情永远不会改变,但是当人们想要改变的时候,他们的记忆力却短的惊人……
pepsiumar
War involves human. You cannot predict humans. No computer can.
战争涉及到人类。你无法预测人类。任何电脑都做不到。
Yabba_Dabba_Dooo
@Mad...didn't the UK fight a little war called the 100 years war? Obviously it wasn't 100 years but I just find it ironic that a Brit wants to lecture the US about wars when you guys couldn't get along with ANYONE in Europe from the very beginning of your existence until the end of WW2.
@Mad...英国是不是打过一场叫做白年战争的小小的战争?很显然它不是一百年,但我刚刚发现了一个讽刺的地方,你们从一开始就跟欧洲的任何国家都合不来,直到二战末,在这种情况下,一个英国人竟然在对美国进行战争方面的说教。
illuminated_one
Humans are the most predictable creatures on the planet, especially neo cons.
人类是地球上最容易预测的生物,尤其是新保守党。
Steve-pa
We still have thousands of atomic warheads. I'm not scared
我们依然有成千上万的核弹头,我不害怕。
Tofana
Trident doesn't have codes, you idiot.
三叉戟没有密码,你个白痴。
illuminated_one
So does Russia................................and China has a few hundred.
俄罗斯也一样……中国也有几百个。
Peter Trzop
Lol, this was a good laugh
lol,这条新闻真好笑。
Dirty Laundry
Aw Lawz! This is serious bizness! Where's dat rascal cat Tom? Toooommm! We done got mice in da house! (Some of you will fall for any hysteria and it's making the rest of us sick of you.)
这件事很严肃!那只流氓汤姆猫哪里去了?汤昂昂昂姆!我们家里出老鼠了!(你们中的一些人会陷入歇斯底里,让我们其他人讨厌你们。)
danidin
The purpose of this report is to attempt to justify the added $24 billion the US military is angling for..
这份报告的目的就是为美国军方谋求额外的240亿军费辩护……

Jelly-Bean-Jon
@Bikbon~ Their idea of "society continuation" is all those in charge survive, they don't have a plan for the people who actually do the work.
他们的“社会存续”的意思是所有掌权的人能活下去,他们并没有给那些真正干活的人制定计划。
Frank W. Smith
About as believable as CNN.
这篇文章跟CNN一样可信。
illuminated_one
Or the BBC.
或者是BBC。
weavy11
Real warr events are more different than some computer generated data. All nonsense.
真实的战争事件与计算机生成的数据有很大的不同。全都是无稽之谈。
notafraidofthem
Yeah, if this had any truth to it, it would never be allowed to be printed. Most likely some reverse psychological propaganda.
是的,如果有什么真实性的话,它就永远不会获准出版。很可能是一些反向心理宣传。
Left.and.uphill
That's right. Just look how Vietnam crushed America
说得对,只需要看看越南是如何击败美国的。
Lazybum2
Don't write off the 2nd Amendment.
不要取消第二修正案。
Chris
It's downright pointless ignoring the EU as we're not just on Russias doorstep but we're ailed and militarily fortified with US hardware/troops. Do they want us to believe 120 million Russians with a minuscule economy and military budget the size of Tesco's produce budget is going to defeat 850 million people with a budget hundreds of times larger?
这份报告毫无意义,它无视了欧盟,因为我们不仅站在俄罗斯的家门口,而且我们还结盟了,并且在军事方面用美国的硬件/部队加强了。1.2亿俄国人凭借微不足道的经济和军事预算——跟特斯科的生产预算差不多,能打败拥有几百倍预算的8.5亿人?他们难道想让我们相信这种说法?
Nehemiah Scudder
@Chris,America has been tearing up every agreement it ever signed,and insulting its allies at every opportunity .America may well find those allies tearing up their agreements at a time most inconvenient to the USA.
美国撕毁了它曾经签署的每一份协议,并利用一切机会侮辱它的盟友。美国很可能会发现,那些盟友在美国最不舒服的时候撕毁协议。
相关链接
-
西方的俄罗斯恐惧症
2019/03/15 11849 37 2 -
印度可能从4月1日起对美国商品征收报复性关税
2019/03/15 15219 42 2 -
为什么中国的每个人对未来都那么的乐观?
2019/03/14 39370 108 2 -
印度不了解中国的事情有哪些?
2019/03/14 33625 108 2 -
为什么中国的内部凝聚力比印度强?
2019/03/14 44088 226 2 -
分析师警告称,在模拟第三次世界大战的大多数情景中,美国军队都被
2019/03/14 24626 95 2 -
移民到中国有多困难?
2019/03/14 35656 117 2 -
美国航空公司和西南航空公司在埃塞空难后仍将驾驶波音737 Max 8飞
2019/03/13 25414 41 2
评论已关闭